Quoting Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Too bad! It's really nice and useful!
>
> The functionality won't be going away (though it might hiccup a bit),
> since it definitely is still useful. Just the communication
> implementation between NM and named. Everyone agrees that it's nice to
> h
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:20 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > Use bind with dbus turned on and it all just works.
> >> >
> >> > -derek
> >> Apparantly that is going away:
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg00146.htm
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Use bind with dbus turned on and it all just works.
>> >
>> > -derek
>> Apparantly that is going away:
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-December/msg00146.html
>
> Yeah...
Too bad! It's really nice and useful!
> Dan
-derek
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 11:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> > Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
> >> thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
> >> overwrite reso
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:36 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
> > > thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The proble
Derek Atkins wrote:
> Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
>> thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
>> overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
>
> Use bind with dbus turned
Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
> thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
> overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
Use bind with dbus turned on and it all just works.
-der
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
> > thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
> > overwrite resolv.conf. What is the reco
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:52 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> Is there some way to get nm to cooperate with a local caching NS? I'm
> thinking dnsmasq, since it's lightweight. The problem is that NM will
> overwrite resolv.conf. What is the recommendation?
With 0.7 we need to rethink the caching name
