I (Daniel Gnoutcheff) agree to license my contributions to
NetworkManager under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License
version v2.1 or (at your option) any later version.
Thanks,
Daniel G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Ciaran,
that is great.
We thank SUSE for this agrement, and thank you personally for helping
with this!!
best,
Thomas
For reference:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/commit/f0ec4bb59a88c41a308121612ae296e002745d4a
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 09:39 +,
Dan,
this applies also to code contributed by Novell/SUSE employees in the
period you cited. That code is all copyright SUSE LLC now.
Ciaran
On 17/09/2020 18:31, Dan Williams wrote:
> Ciaran,
>
> Just to clarify, does this authorization include contributions made by
> Novell/SUSE employees,
Ciaran,
Just to clarify, does this authorization include contributions made by
Novell/SUSE employees, when Novell and SUSE were combined from 2003 -
2011?
Thanks!
Dan
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 15:09 +, Ciaran Farrell wrote:
> SUSE LLC hereby agrees to relicense any contributions under SUSE LLC
SUSE LLC hereby agrees to relicense any contributions under SUSE LLC or
its corporate affiliates' ("SUSE Group") copyright to NetworkManager
under GNU LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Specifically, this authorization applies to contributions of SUSE Group
made by and through its employees,
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 18:43 +0200, Andrew Zaborowski via
networkmanager-list wrote:
> Intel Corporation, by and through Mark Skarpness, Vice President and
> GM of IAGS-OISA-System Software Engineering, hereby agrees to
> relicense any contributions under Intel Corporation's copyright to
>
Intel Corporation, by and through Mark Skarpness, Vice President and
GM of IAGS-OISA-System Software Engineering, hereby agrees to
relicense any contributions under Intel Corporation's copyright to
NetworkManager under GNU LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Specifically, this authorization
I, Bryan Clark agree to re-license my contributions to NetworkManager as
LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Some of my work may be held under copyright by Red Hat, Inc. I do not speak
for that entity.
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
I, Thomas Bechtold, agree to relicense my contributions to
NetworkManager as LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Thomas Bechtold
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
I, David Cantrell, agree to relicense my contributions to NetworkManager as
LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
--
David Cantrell
WH6DSN | https://www.burdell.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
I, Przemysław Grzegorczyk, agree to relicense my contributions to
NetworkManager as LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Przemysław
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Hey,
I agree to relicense all the code I've written in NetworkManager to LGPL2.1+.
Cheers!
--
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
FWIW,
I, Koukousoulas Pantelis, agree to relicense my contributions to
NetworkManager as LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller. (I don't know if
there is any code from me
left in NetworkManager, since I haven't touched the project for many years,
but in case there is, I happily agree to relicense
Hello,
I, Mario Sánchez Prada, agree to relicense all my contributions to
NetworkManager as LGPL-2.1+, as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Note that I made those contributions with a former email address of mine
(ma...@endlessm.com), so such work may be held under copyright by the
company "Endless
I confirm that I am the copyright owner of the contributions I made to
NetworkManager (using the email gcampa...@src.gnome.org in the git
history), and I am ok with the relicensing to LGPL2.1+
Signed,
Giovanni Campagna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I, Colin Walters, agree to relicense my contributions to NetworkManager as
LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Some of my work may be held under copyright by Red Hat, Inc. I do not speak for
that entity.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hello,
I agree to re-licensing all my contributions that I have made to
NetworkManager, both in the case that they are owned by Red Hat
(contribution address ) or possibly by myself, to
LGPL-2.1 or any later version.
Benjamin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I, Tambet Ingo, agree to relicense my contributions to NetworkManager as
LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Some of my work may be held under copyright by Novell, Inc. I do not speak
for that entity.
Tambet
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
I, Pavel Šimerda, agree to relicense my contributions to NetworkManager
as LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Some of my work may be held under copyright by Red Hat. I do not speak
for that entity.
Pavel
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
I, Robert Love, agree to relicense my contributions to NetworkManager as
LGPL-2.1+ as proposed by Thomas Haller.
Some of my work may be held under copyright by Novell, Inc. I do not speak
for that entity.
Robert
___
networkmanager-list mailing
Am 09.01.20 um 13:26 schrieb Thomas Haller via networkmanager-list:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
> This will be addressed by [1].
>
> However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
> collect agreement/disagreement of
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Haller via
networkmanager-list wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
> This will be addressed by [1].
>
> However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
> collect
I have pushed a new MR[0] which adds the missing license to the meson build
files. Although all the meson build files have been modified in such MR,
there are some files that have not been created by me, so I suppose that an
explicit authorization is also required. These are the meson build files
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 10:06 +0100, Francesco Giudici via
networkmanager-list wrote:
>
> On 09/01/20 15:40, Dan Williams via networkmanager-list wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 09:14 -0500, Dan Winship via networkmanager-list
> > wrote:
> > > Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Iñigo Martínez via networkmanager-
list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What about meson build files? Although usually the license is not included,
> there are some exceptions that they do[0].
>
> If necessary, I also agree with relicensing.
It's somewhat unfortunate that
On 09/01/20 15:40, Dan Williams via networkmanager-list wrote:
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 09:14 -0500, Dan Winship via networkmanager-list
wrote:
Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the relicensing. I am not
the
copyright holder of any code in NetworkManager and do not believe
that I
have
Hi,
What about meson build files? Although usually the license is not included,
there are some exceptions that they do[0].
If necessary, I also agree with relicensing.
BR,
[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build
El jue., 9 ene. 2020 a las 15:40, Dan Williams via
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 09:14 -0500, Dan Winship via networkmanager-list
wrote:
> Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the relicensing. I am not
> the
> copyright holder of any code in NetworkManager and do not believe
> that I
> have any say in this decision, but if it turns out that I do,
Thomas asked me to send email agreeing to the relicensing. I am not the
copyright holder of any code in NetworkManager and do not believe that I
have any say in this decision, but if it turns out that I do, then,
sure, I agree.
-- Dan
___
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +0100, Thomas Haller via networkmanager-list
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
> This will be addressed by [1].
>
> However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
> collect
Hi all,
Currently, we have some LGPL vs. GPL license issue in libnm.
This will be addressed by [1].
However, I'd like not only to fix that particular issue, but instead
collect agreement/disagreement of copyright holders of NetworkManager
code, to perform this and future such relicensing.
I
31 matches
Mail list logo
