On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 10:21 -0700, Robert Smits wrote:
> SCPM has been around for eons. Unlike network manager it actually does
> look
> after switching my nfs network settings between home, job, and an internet
> cafe. I wish it did just work.
Is the project actively maintained by Novell or an
On September 10, 2008 12:03:19 pm Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 08:44 -0700, Robert Smits wrote:
> > On September 10, 2008 06:23:12 am Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Is NM capable of handling the followin
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can do all sorts of magic, but that wasn't the point. You don't always
> have an access to DHCP and/or DNS servers to configure all sorts of things
> (or your request is denied).
Sure but there is no point in impleme
Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately the office network has also a DHCP server.
Wouldn't it make more sense to properly configure the DHCP server then? ;)
Yeah,
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 12:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately the office network has also a DHCP server.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to properly configure the DHCP server then? ;)
Yeah, seriously, hav
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Kristian Slavov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately the office network has also a DHCP server.
Wouldn't it make more sense to properly configure the DHCP server then? ;)
--
Patryk Zawadzki
___
NetworkManager-lis
Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
Hi,
Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once outside,
DHCP is used to get an address.
NM 0.7 is, but since you're mixing the two there will be s
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 13:41 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> At 9:23am -0400 on Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
> >> Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
> >> A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once ou
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Williams
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:03 PM
To: Robert Smits
Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Static and dynamic wired interface
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 08:44 -0700, Robert Smits
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 08:44 -0700, Robert Smits wrote:
> On September 10, 2008 06:23:12 am Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
> > > A laptop, when located at office, has a static a
At 9:23am -0400 on Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
>> Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
>> A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once outside,
>> DHCP is used to get an address.
>
> NM 0.7 is, but
On September 10, 2008 06:23:12 am Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
> > A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once outside,
> > DHCP is used to get an address.
>
> NM 0.
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:01 +0300, Kristian Slavov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
> A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once outside,
> DHCP is used to get an address.
NM 0.7 is, but since you're mixing the two there will be some manual
ope
Hi,
Is NM capable of handling the following scenario?
A laptop, when located at office, has a static address. Once outside,
DHCP is used to get an address.
Cheers,
KS
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
NetworkManager-list mai
14 matches
Mail list logo
