Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
Ian Campbell wrote: >> So how are you doing DHCP then? >> >> NM requests information from dhcdbd, and dhcdbd gets its information >> from the dhclient script. But the dhclient script only gets notified to >> push the information back to dhcdbd if you have a -x aware dhclient. >> >> So, you will ne

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread RĂ©mi Cardona
Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:00:16AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: Right at the top. Make it the first stuff executed for the script, though it can be below the comments. You'll also need to make your dhclient -x aware, and tell dhcdbd to pass -x to dhclient. Thanks, that fixe

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Ian Campbell
> So how are you doing DHCP then? > > NM requests information from dhcdbd, and dhcdbd gets its information > from the dhclient script. But the dhclient script only gets notified to > push the information back to dhcdbd if you have a -x aware dhclient. > > So, you will need: > > 1) dhcdbd > 2) d

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:00:16AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > Right at the top. Make it the first stuff executed for the script, > though it can be below the comments. > > You'll also need to make your dhclient -x aware, and tell dhcdbd to pass > -x to dhclient. Thanks, that fixed it. For any

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:59 -0400, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Does your dhclient-script have the correct magic to forward DHCP > > information back to dhcdbd? > > > > if [ -n "${dhc_dbus}" ]; then > >/bin/dbus-send \ > >--system \ > >--dest=com.redhat.dhcp \ > >--type=meth

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:52 -0400, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:34:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > man dhclient: > > "The -x argument enables eXtended option information to be > > created in the -s dhclient-script environment, which would > > allow applications

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Ian Campbell
> Does your dhclient-script have the correct magic to forward DHCP > information back to dhcdbd? > > if [ -n "${dhc_dbus}" ]; then >/bin/dbus-send \ >--system \ >--dest=com.redhat.dhcp \ >--type=method_call \ >/com/redhat/dhcp/$interface \ >com.redhat.dh

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:34:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > man dhclient: > "The -x argument enables eXtended option information to be > created in the -s dhclient-script environment, which would > allow applications running in that environment to handle > options they do not kno

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 07:20 -0400, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Same configuration, same problem. It appears to be a problem with > > wpa_supplicant; it is not associating with the AP. I'll try to get a log > > sometime tomorrow, but the basic problem is that wpa_supplicant just > > gets to "Trying 0C:0

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Ian Campbell
> Same configuration, same problem. It appears to be a problem with > wpa_supplicant; it is not associating with the AP. I'll try to get a log > sometime tomorrow, but the basic problem is that wpa_supplicant just > gets to "Trying 0C:0A:.." (the AP). I'm running the (in)famous > broadcom/ndisw

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
man dhclient: "The -x argument enables eXtended option information to be created in the -s dhclient-script environment, which would allow applications running in that environment to handle options they do not know about in advance." With -x in dhclient do you have problem? >I'm having a s

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:11:17PM +1100, Robert Bertram wrote: > It's possibly not related to my problem but are you using a shared > key(restricted)? Whoops, I meant for this to go to the list too. No, open. ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list Netwo

Re: Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-01 Thread Robert Bertram
Hi Ian, It's possibly not related to my problem but are you using a shared key(restricted)? Rob. Ian Campbell wrote: I'm having a strange problem with NetworkManager 0.5.1 and 0.5.2 from 2006-02-21 (The two current builds in the Gentopia portage overlay)b NetworkManager will set the essid a

Strange behaviour from 0.5.1 and 2006-02-21 cvs

2006-03-01 Thread Ian Campbell
I'm having a strange problem with NetworkManager 0.5.1 and 0.5.2 from 2006-02-21 (The two current builds in the Gentopia portage overlay) NetworkManager will set the essid and the wep key for the network properly, it'll get an ip address and set a route, and then it will just... hang there, spinni