e1000 events lost after suspend/resume (was Re: Two issues with 0.3.5)

Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:00 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've got two issues with 0.3.5 right now (well, STABLE_0_3 branch): >>&

Re: Two issues with 0.3.5

Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:00 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've got two issues with 0.3.5 right now (well, STABLE_0_3 branch): >> >> 1) it's not noticing eth0. I've got kernel log messages

Re: Two issues with 0.3.5

Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:00 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've got two issues with 0.3.5 right now (well, STABLE_0_3 branch): >> >> 1) it's not noticing eth0. I've got kernel log messages

Re: Two issues with 0.3.5

On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:00 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > I've got two issues with 0.3.5 right now (well, STABLE_0_3 branch): > > 1) it's not noticing eth0. I've got kernel log messages that the >cable is plugged in, but NM never seems to switch

Two issues with 0.3.5

Hi, I've got two issues with 0.3.5 right now (well, STABLE_0_3 branch): 1) it's not noticing eth0. I've got kernel log messages that the cable is plugged in, but NM never seems to switch to the ethernet device. I'm wondering if dbus or hal is wedged. Is there some