On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 08:56 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
Not sure specifically, but we're killing dhcdbd dead dead dead.
Lovely. Can't wait to see it go away.
Thanks,
Timo
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 08:56 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
Not sure specifically, but we're killing dhcdbd dead dead dead. Might
be able to do that for a 0.6.x version of NetworkManager, definitely for
0.7.x. It's worked out pretty well in the OLPC branch of NM so far and
seems pretty robust.
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 16:43 -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
Not sure who to talk to about dhcdbd so I figured I would shoot a mail
to the list - the latest Release Candidates for DHCP 3.1 now have their
own -x option which
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 20:34 +, Luis Medinas wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 08:56 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
Not sure specifically, but we're killing dhcdbd dead dead dead. Might
be able to do that for a 0.6.x version of NetworkManager, definitely for
0.7.x. It's worked out pretty well
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 16:43 -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
Not sure who to talk to about dhcdbd so I figured I would shoot a mail
to the list - the latest Release Candidates for DHCP 3.1 now have their
own -x option which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
Not sure who to talk to about dhcdbd so I figured I would shoot a mail
to the list - the latest Release Candidates for DHCP 3.1 now have their
own -x option which interferes with the one that NetworkManager uses...
How are other distros
