On 10/26/06, Zach Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my school uses a WPA secured network, and NM can't connect to it
> however, i can connect to it just fine using wpa_supplicant
>
> I'm not positive on the details, but here's the working wpa_supplicant.conf:
>
Here is what Dan said regarding
my school uses a WPA secured network, and NM can't connect to ithowever, i can connect to it just fine using wpa_supplicantI'm not positive on the details, but here's the working wpa_supplicant.conf:eapol_version=1
ap_scan=1fast_reauth=1network={ ssid="*" proto=RSN #proto=
The last mention of WPA I can find in the archives was back at the end
of June.
NetworkManager is fantastic, but useless to me without WPA. Before I start
hacking some code, could anybody update me on the present state of the
WPA fixes? I can see no mention of wpa related changes in HEAD.
So
>
> Currently there's drivers for:
> HostAP
> MadWifi
> Prism54
> Atmel
> Broadcom
> Intel IPW2100/2200
> Wireless Extension
> Ndiswrapper
>
I see ndiswrapper, how about linuxant?
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http:/
Neal Becker wrote:
>>Currently there's drivers for:
>>HostAP
>>MadWifi
>>Prism54
>>Atmel
>>Broadcom
>>Intel IPW2100/2200
>>Wireless Extension
>>Ndiswrapper
>>
>
>
> I see ndiswrapper, how about linuxant?
This is supported under the hostap driver
> _
>
> Currently there's drivers for:
> HostAP
> MadWifi
> Prism54
> Atmel
> Broadcom
> Intel IPW2100/2200
> Wireless Extension
> Ndiswrapper
>
I see ndiswrapper, how about linuxant?
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http:/
On 5/3/05, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, while we get driver information from HAL, we may need to let
> wpa_supplicant determine the driver to use. I'm not sure about that since I
> haven't seen the wpa_supplicant driver selection code, if any. Or are drivers
> manually set in t
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Tim Warberg wrote:
> On 5/2/05, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > WPA_Supplicant already have a mode where SSID scanning and association
> > > is controlled by user and i think this is a good base for
> > > NetworkManager integration. Also for now i think it would b
On 5/2/05, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd advocate using the control socket to WPA supplicant rather than
> making it a library though. It would be easier to simply drop in a new
> wpa_supplicant and to track upstream, and Jouni hasn't been very
> receptive to the idea of making a l
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 21:43 +0200, Tim Warberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scanning the archive it doesn't look like anyone is actively working
> on this? If not, I'd like to offer my help. I don't have much
I've thought a lot about this in the past, and had email conversations
with wpa_supplicant's author
Hi,
Scanning the archive it doesn't look like anyone is actively working
on this? If not, I'd like to offer my help. I don't have much
experience coding C, mostly done C++ and Java.
As I see it first task is to chance WPA_Supplicant into a library. I
think acquainting myself with the inner works
11 matches
Mail list logo