Re: WPA support for my network

2006-10-26 Thread Darren Albers
On 10/26/06, Zach Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my school uses a WPA secured network, and NM can't connect to it > however, i can connect to it just fine using wpa_supplicant > > I'm not positive on the details, but here's the working wpa_supplicant.conf: > Here is what Dan said regarding

WPA support for my network

2006-10-26 Thread Zach Tibbitts
my school uses a WPA secured network, and NM can't connect to ithowever, i can connect to it just fine using wpa_supplicantI'm not positive on the details, but here's the working wpa_supplicant.conf:eapol_version=1 ap_scan=1fast_reauth=1network={   ssid="*"   proto=RSN   #proto=

NetworkManager WPA support status?... wpa_supplicant?

2005-08-15 Thread Antony J Mee
The last mention of WPA I can find in the archives was back at the end of June. NetworkManager is fantastic, but useless to me without WPA. Before I start hacking some code, could anybody update me on the present state of the WPA fixes? I can see no mention of wpa related changes in HEAD. So

Re: WPA support

2005-05-04 Thread Neal Becker
> > Currently there's drivers for: > HostAP > MadWifi > Prism54 > Atmel > Broadcom > Intel IPW2100/2200 > Wireless Extension > Ndiswrapper > I see ndiswrapper, how about linuxant? ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http:/

Re: WPA support

2005-05-03 Thread Simon Goodall
Neal Becker wrote: >>Currently there's drivers for: >>HostAP >>MadWifi >>Prism54 >>Atmel >>Broadcom >>Intel IPW2100/2200 >>Wireless Extension >>Ndiswrapper >> > > > I see ndiswrapper, how about linuxant? This is supported under the hostap driver > _

Re: WPA support

2005-05-03 Thread Neal Becker
> > Currently there's drivers for: > HostAP > MadWifi > Prism54 > Atmel > Broadcom > Intel IPW2100/2200 > Wireless Extension > Ndiswrapper > I see ndiswrapper, how about linuxant? ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http:/

Re: WPA support

2005-05-03 Thread Tim Warberg
On 5/3/05, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, while we get driver information from HAL, we may need to let > wpa_supplicant determine the driver to use. I'm not sure about that since I > haven't seen the wpa_supplicant driver selection code, if any. Or are drivers > manually set in t

Re: WPA support

2005-05-02 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Tim Warberg wrote: > On 5/2/05, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > WPA_Supplicant already have a mode where SSID scanning and association > > > is controlled by user and i think this is a good base for > > > NetworkManager integration. Also for now i think it would b

Re: WPA support

2005-05-02 Thread Tim Warberg
On 5/2/05, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd advocate using the control socket to WPA supplicant rather than > making it a library though. It would be easier to simply drop in a new > wpa_supplicant and to track upstream, and Jouni hasn't been very > receptive to the idea of making a l

Re: WPA support

2005-05-02 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 21:43 +0200, Tim Warberg wrote: > Hi, > > Scanning the archive it doesn't look like anyone is actively working > on this? If not, I'd like to offer my help. I don't have much I've thought a lot about this in the past, and had email conversations with wpa_supplicant's author

WPA support

2005-05-02 Thread Tim Warberg
Hi, Scanning the archive it doesn't look like anyone is actively working on this? If not, I'd like to offer my help. I don't have much experience coding C, mostly done C++ and Java. As I see it first task is to chance WPA_Supplicant into a library. I think acquainting myself with the inner works