--On Friday, October 02, 2009 18:25:59 -0700 Dan Williams
wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 22:54 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> I think your call on VBox was the right one.
>
> So now having installed 2.2 again, there's no problems with the WiFi
> device. Bizarre bug, I'd never have made that connecti
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 22:54 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> Dan
>
> I think your call on VBox was the right one. I was running the latest
> 3.0.6, but I'd already been thinking of reverting to 2.2 because it's
> actually quicker and I don't need the new bits in 3.0.
>
> So now having installed 2.2 aga
Dan
I think your call on VBox was the right one. I was running the latest
3.0.6, but I'd already been thinking of reverting to 2.2 because it's
actually quicker and I don't need the new bits in 3.0.
So now having installed 2.2 again, there's no problems with the WiFi
device. Bizarre bug, I'd
--On Thursday, October 01, 2009 14:13:14 -0700 Dan Williams
wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:31 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> I'm getting a repeated problem of my WiFi device showing up twice in
> NM. This isn't really an NM problem, but I'm hoping someone here will
> have an idea how to fix it.
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 16:31 +0100, Rick Jones wrote:
> I'm getting a repeated problem of my WiFi device showing up twice in
> NM. This isn't really an NM problem, but I'm hoping someone here will
> have an idea how to fix it.
NM 0.8? Or NM 0.7?
For 0.7, run 'lshal' and look for device blocks wit
I'm getting a repeated problem of my WiFi device showing up twice in NM.
This isn't really an NM problem, but I'm hoping someone here will have an
idea how to fix it.
The device appears twice in DBus, which is obviously the source of the
problem, as NM is just listing what it finds. Both entri
