Re: What about the patch for USB gadgets?

2011-05-12 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:11 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Hi, > > there was a patch sent to the list in February: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2011-February/msg00152.html > > However, I can't find any reaction on the list, neither > approval nor rejection. Can someo

Re: What about the patch for USB gadgets?

2011-05-12 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Hi Dan, On 12/05/11 04:55, Dan Williams wrote: A quick question on these, are they properly represented in sysfs or are they "virtual" devices? Given that they are USB connected it would seem they should be properly presented, even in the case of platform drivers since there has to be a USB tre

Re: What about the patch for USB gadgets?

2011-05-11 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:11 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Hi, > > there was a patch sent to the list in February: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2011-February/msg00152.html > > However, I can't find any reaction on the list, neither > approval nor rejection. Can someo

What about the patch for USB gadgets?

2011-05-11 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Hi, there was a patch sent to the list in February: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2011-February/msg00152.html However, I can't find any reaction on the list, neither approval nor rejection. Can someone comment on the patch or point me to existing comments, please? TIA! Che