On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 14:28 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Is that something you intend to ship and support going forward, ie a
> > tool that distros should start including alongside dnsmasq and the like?
>
> If there was interest, yes. Howeve
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Is that something you intend to ship and support going forward, ie a
> tool that distros should start including alongside dnsmasq and the like?
If there was interest, yes. However, if you're just looking for
dnsmasq or BIND DBus support (or an
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 11:54 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Colin and I discussed this last week too; is the Chromium cache a
> > machine-global cache (ie, running other programs would also route
> > requests through the cache), or does Chromi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Colin and I discussed this last week too; is the Chromium cache a
> machine-global cache (ie, running other programs would also route
> requests through the cache), or does Chromium want the DNS data in
> parallel with the normal glibc resolv
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 14:28 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
> > As ever, the patches are at
> > http://github.com/agl/NetworkManager/commits/agl3
>
> Since Dan seems to be doing a batch of email replies right now, I'm
> just bumping this thread ;
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
> As ever, the patches are at http://github.com/agl/NetworkManager/commits/agl3
Since Dan seems to be doing a batch of email replies right now, I'm
just bumping this thread ;)
AGL
--
Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialv
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Overall, approach looks pretty good. I wont' subject you to
> GInterface/GObject if you don't volunteer for it (though I'd be happy to
> guide) so let me know when you've got the style cleanups and I'll run
> through again. Thanks!
I rewrote
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:53:10 -0700
From: Adam Langley
Just for reference, I've been running with my patch
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=551747
for the past several months. It should be pretty trivial to merge/paste it
into what you're doing. Would be nice to be able to stop hav
Hi Adam,
> > Well, Marcel had some valid issues with dnsmasq, and others may want to
> > use bind, so in the end we probably want a GInterface for this and then
> > have classes that implement the GInterface for each of the specific
> > caching name daemons. I don't really have a problem with tha
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Well, Marcel had some valid issues with dnsmasq, and others may want to
> use bind, so in the end we probably want a GInterface for this and then
> have classes that implement the GInterface for each of the specific
> caching name daemons. I d
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 13:12 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
> > It appears that I need to make the IP config code asynchronous as a
> > first step. I'll start hacking on that.
>
> Please see the commits at http://github.com/agl/NetworkManager/commit
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:01 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
> > (is that a good way to post patches? If not, what would folks prefer?)
>
> Ping. Just being a squeaky wheel here!
>
Sorry! Trying to clean up some loose ends here before a 0.7.2 rel
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
> (is that a good way to post patches? If not, what would folks prefer?)
Ping. Just being a squeaky wheel here!
AGL
--
Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org
___
Network
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
> It appears that I need to make the IP config code asynchronous as a
> first step. I'll start hacking on that.
Please see the commits at http://github.com/agl/NetworkManager/commits/agl
(is that a good way to post patches? If not, what would fo
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> If imposing a local DNS cache, please use Unbound or Bind, as those
> are currently the only ones supporting DNSSEC.
For the purposes of NetworkManager, so long as the DBus interface
exists, the underlying server doesn't matter.
It appears tha
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 18:25 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> >>> The most common local caching nameserver is currently dnsmasq, and it
> >>> also provides a D-Bus interface. If at all possible, we should try to
> >>> use *one* dbus interface. Not sure if y
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
The most common local caching nameserver is currently dnsmasq, and it
also provides a D-Bus interface. If at all possible, we should try to
use *one* dbus interface. Not sure if you've looked at the dnsmasq dbus
API, but it might be worth a glance.
I d
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:04 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> > > I'm one of the developers on Chromium[1] (aka Google Chrome) for
> > > Linux. Chromium likes to prefetch DNS records a lot and, as such, we
> > > would very much like it if Linux systems came with a local DNS cache.
> > >
Hi Dan,
> > I'm one of the developers on Chromium[1] (aka Google Chrome) for
> > Linux. Chromium likes to prefetch DNS records a lot and, as such, we
> > would very much like it if Linux systems came with a local DNS cache.
> >
> > To that end, I'm hacking up DJB's public domain DNS cache[2] to b
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 20:27 -0700, Adam Langley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm one of the developers on Chromium[1] (aka Google Chrome) for
> Linux. Chromium likes to prefetch DNS records a lot and, as such, we
> would very much like it if Linux systems came with a local DNS cache.
>
> To that end, I'm hac
Hi,
I'm one of the developers on Chromium[1] (aka Google Chrome) for
Linux. Chromium likes to prefetch DNS records a lot and, as such, we
would very much like it if Linux systems came with a local DNS cache.
To that end, I'm hacking up DJB's public domain DNS cache[2] to build
with autotools, hav
21 matches
Mail list logo
