Re: Would Provision Domain Names be hard to implement in NM? (RFC 8801)

2022-05-31 Thread Petr Menšík via networkmanager-list
On 5/31/22 11:18, Beniamino Galvani wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 01:14:51PM +0200, Petr Menšík via networkmanager-list > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> RFC 8801 [1] is standard tracks already. Would it be difficult to >> implement it in NM? I think it provides very nice way to make profiles >> on

Re: Would Provision Domain Names be hard to implement in NM? (RFC 8801)

2022-05-31 Thread Beniamino Galvani via networkmanager-list
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 01:14:51PM +0200, Petr Menšík via networkmanager-list wrote: > Hi, > > RFC 8801 [1] is standard tracks already. Would it be difficult to > implement it in NM? I think it provides very nice way to make profiles > on ethernet connections for example. Not sure if I can have

Would Provision Domain Names be hard to implement in NM? (RFC 8801)

2022-05-30 Thread Petr Menšík via networkmanager-list
Hi, RFC 8801 [1] is standard tracks already. Would it be difficult to implement it in NM? I think it provides very nice way to make profiles on ethernet connections for example. Not sure if I can have multiple configurations switched automatically withou Radius used for port security. But this