Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/threaded threaded.c

2001-03-23 Thread Bill Stoddard
Good catch. I don't work on the Unix side of the house and missed this. Changing it now. Thanks Bill - return 0; +exit(0); } /* else */ ap_scoreboard_image-parent[slot].pid = pid; This is not cool. This isn't cleaning the child process correctly.

Re: [Patch]: Suggested patch to fix perform_idle_server_cleanup window.

2001-03-23 Thread Greg Ames
"Paul J. Reder" wrote: These two functions could easily be merged, OK, that sounds like a good first step. But better still would be to make this so simple for the mainline code that no function or macro is called for. Just test one variable. I could see moving some of the path

mkstemp patches

2001-03-23 Thread Blue Lang
Heya, There are status messages and open bugs wrt the use of tmpnam() instead of mkstemp(). Message id Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains patches for this, but it doesn't make allowances for systems that don't have mkstemp() and it only applies to 1.3. Is compatibility with systems lacking

Re: mkstemp patches

2001-03-23 Thread Philippe M . Chiasson
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:39:54PM -0500, Blue Lang wrote: Heya, There are status messages and open bugs wrt the use of tmpnam() instead of mkstemp(). Message id Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains patches for this, but it doesn't make allowances for systems that don't have mkstemp()

Re: Deficiency in mod_rewrite

2001-03-23 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: I just realised that mod_rewrite has a fairly significant deficiency: since it uses '%' and '$' for its own purposes in signalling substitution, there does not appear to be any way to include these characters explicitly in the rewritten string. The obvious

Re: mkstemp patches

2001-03-23 Thread Blue Lang
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote: Well, I didn't think about that, but having had to look thru the code to make my submitted patch, I noticed more than one potential improvements in the code. I think it's something I could manage to 'tackle' you will find that 2.0 is not at

Re: Deficiency in mod_rewrite

2001-03-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:18 PM I just realised that mod_rewrite has a fairly significant deficiency: since it uses '%' and '$' for its own purposes in signalling substitution, there does not appear to be any way to include these

Re: Deficiency in mod_rewrite

2001-03-23 Thread Andy Gardner
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: I just realised that mod_rewrite has a fairly significant deficiency: since it uses '%' and '$' for its own purposes in signalling substitution, there does not appear to be any way to include these characters explicitly in the rewritten string. Just while

Re: mkstemp patches

2001-03-23 Thread Philippe M . Chiasson
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:22:32PM -0500, Blue Lang wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote: Well, I didn't think about that, but having had to look thru the code to make my submitted patch, I noticed more than one potential improvements in the code. I think it's

How to link...

2001-03-23 Thread David Reid
This came to light while trying to get PHP to build as a shared object for BeOS with apache 2, but I don't think it'll be a problem unique to beos... Basically, it won't link as beos doesn't allow undefined symbols in libraries. this present a problem when trying to use the brigades, filters

Re: BindAddress and Listen

2001-03-23 Thread dean gaudet
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: With a far greater understanding than I had 24 hours ago... Is there any reason not to just _Drop_ the BindAddress directive and strictly use the Listen directive for Apache 2.0? I'd even go so far as depreciate the Port directive in favor