Historically, stuff directly at the 'Apache.Org' domain
has been related to the HTTP server project. Other
major projects, like the XML and Java stuff, came
afterward, and are based on a related hostname.
The HTTP server project started following suit when the
project's Web site became
Currently, mod_auth (and friends) return DECLINED when asked
to authenticate a user and there is no AuthUserFile declared.
This means that the server checks with all the other
authentication handlers, and is likely to eventually die
with a 500 status and the cryptic 'no user file?' message
in the
Ian Kallen wrote:
Oooh boy, I think this stuff is a mess (or if it's neater than my
perception of it, I need to get it clarified for myself :)
Yes, it is very messy. I have a massively cleaned-up version
in my head, but..
It is my opinion that if AuthUserFile is not specified mod_auth
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/12 15:53:18 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/08/10 20:16:54 $]
Release:
2.0.23 : tagged August 7, 2001
2.0.22 : rolled July 29, 2001
2.0.21 : rolled July 20, 2001
2.0.20 : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19 : rolled
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/12 15:53:18 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/12 15:53:18 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/31 19:21:50 $]
Release:
2.0.22 : rolled July 29, 2001
2.0.21 : rolled July 20, 2001
2.0.20 : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19 : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18 : rolled May
Not acked.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
Apache Server for Dummieshttp://Apache-Server.Com/
Apache Server Unleashed http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
-Original Message-
Not acked.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
Apache Server for Dummieshttp://Apache-Server.Com/
Apache Server Unleashed http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
How about a decent update on
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/12 15:53:18 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/24 20:20:46 $]
Release:
2.0.21 : re-rolled July 20, 2001, targetted for beta 7/23
2.0.20 : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19 : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18 : rolled May 18,
Not acked.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
Apache Server for Dummieshttp://Apache-Server.Com/
Apache Server Unleashed http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
OK, this time is a people.
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/12 15:53:18 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/18 07:01:32 $]
Release:
2.0.20 : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19 : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18 : rolled May 18, 2001
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/11 14:37:54 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/09 02:51:07 $]
Release:
2.0.20 : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19 : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18 : rolled May 18, 2001
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/02 13:28:47 $]
Release:
2.0.19 : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18 : rolled May 18, 2001
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/23 15:16:46 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/06/27 21:14:15 $]
Release:
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/23 15:16:46 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/06/18 12:52:21 $]
Release:
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/23 15:16:46 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/06/07 10:46:12 $]
Release:
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/23 15:16:46 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/06/05 18:24:28 $]
Release:
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 :
Not acked; old misfiled message. Anyone care to respond?
- Forwarded message from Vaughn, Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Vaughn, Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: I18N Server Side support for OS running foreign locale
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/23 15:16:46 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/25 20:04:47 $]
Release:
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/05/15 16:30:34 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, target release date of 5/18.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/02 09:22:02 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/02 09:22:02 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/27 21:10:39 $]
Release:
2.0.17 : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/02 09:22:02 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/26 19:08:55 $]
Release:
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 :
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/26 19:08:55 $]
Release:
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 :
Dale Ghent wrote:
Besides, I believe that most DNS servers (at least later versions
of BIND) reject hostnames which have underscores (_) in them as
non-legal characters in DNS.
That is what I thought, too, but I received som spam to-day which
included a hostname with an embedded '_' -- and
Joshua Slive wrote:
I know that Ken was recently looking at the issue of escaping in
RewriteRule. Well, the problem also exists in RedirectMatch.
:
Anyway, if anyone wants to take a look:
http://bugs.apache.org/index.cgi/full/7503
Right, I will look at it. Ta.
--
#kenP-)}
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/23 11:33:28 $]
Release:
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/02 09:22:02 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/02 09:22:02 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/18 20:56:03 $]
Release:
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 :
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/02 09:22:02 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/04/04 03:39:39 $]
Release:
2.0.16 : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15 : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 :
Not acked.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
"Apache Server for Dummies" http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Apache Server Unleashed" http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
Hi there,
I do have the following suggestion to
"Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
Nope, -1. This won't work because those are conditions tested
before the request record contains elements needed by die and
its subsequently called subroutines.
I *did* test these cases, you know..
In any case, it is not possible to send custom responses for
"Roy T. Fielding" wrote:
In any case, it is not possible to send custom responses for
every single possible error condition, so we've got better
things to do than fix this problem in 1.3.
Then one of those better things ought to be documenting the
cases in which custom error responses will
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/28 12:20:20 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/25 19:19:44 $]
Release:
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2000
scheduled for release March 10, 2000
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 : released November 20,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to suggest this be released as a beta on Tuesday morning.
I would really, really, really like to encourage us to
take advantage of the current-testers and stable-testers
lists. Or else dispense with them. There are 202 people
on the former, and 215 on
Bill Stoddard wrote:
So what broke rotatelogs? I presume you mean for Windows.
I think it was the UTC offset and naming patch. It sounds
as though strftime() is not in Windows' default libraries,
or something like that.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
wouldn't \% and \$ be reasonably appropriate?
How we represent quoted characters on the input side is
a doddle; the problem is keeping '%' intact through
ap_os_escape_path().
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software
Joshua Slive wrote:
How about an "option" like [NE] for "No-Escape" for the RewriteRule
directive. Sounds a little more obvious than just turing off
the escaping for certain strings.
I thought of that -- but then what happens when '%%' (or '\%')
is present and escaping *has* to be
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
I just realised that mod_rewrite has a fairly significant
deficiency: since it uses '%' and '$' for its own purposes
in signalling substitution, there does not appear to be any
way to include these characters explicitly in the rewritten
string.
The obvious
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/02 22:19:12 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/21 19:09:22 $]
Release:
2.0.14 : rolled March 7, 2000
scheduled for release March 10, 2000
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 : released November 20,
Ryan Morgan wrote:
There is a problem with LimitExcept that causes Apache to enter
an infinite loop when a user tries to remove an extended method.
I am not sure about the status of the extended methods code in
Apache, but this problem is easily reproduce-able with the
following
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/02 22:19:12 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
Greg Stein wrote:
From your log, it would appear that an expat header file was
found in /usr/include
No.
but the corresponding library is not in /usr/lib. Either you
have an inconsistency (partial install)
No. There is some expat stuff in /usr/local/include, put there
as part of a full
Ryan Bloom wrote:
I know I said I would release the alpha's today
FWIW, it is not building for me on Linux (RH 6.2).
Everything is dynign because libexpat cannot be
found. This is after 'make clean' and even after
a completely vanilla checkout.. Here is the log.
Am I missing something
Acked..
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
"Apache Server for Dummies" http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Apache Server Unleashed" http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
ApacheCon 2001!
Four tracks with over 70+ sessions. Free
Not acked.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
"Apache Server for Dummies" http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Apache Server Unleashed" http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
ApacheCon 2001!
Four tracks with over 70+ sessions.
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/02 22:19:12 $]
Release:
1.3.20-dev: Current version.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
1.3.18: Not released.
(Pulled because of an
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/03/07 20:11:50 $]
Release:
2.0b1 : Scheduled to release End of January, 2001
rbb volunteers to be RM
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 : released November
I would like to propose the patch below for suexec in 1.3.20.
If accepted, I will work up a corresponding one for 2.0.
The effect of the patch is to allow 'suexec -V' to print a list
of its compile-time settings, similar to 'httpd -V'. I have
been having to help people debug suexec issues
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
FWIW, I just noticed from my mirror that the 2.0 commit log is
now nearly 40MB in size.. compared to 1.3's 22MB. :-)
D'oh! That is the apache-2.0 module. The httpd-2.0 module
commitlog is only 7MB.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said I was delaying a beta?
I do.
I have no desire to tackle those problems, so I am working on
what I do care about. I am working quite hard to ensure that
I don't break the build, although since I am creating new files,
the windows build is undoubtable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said I was delaying a beta?
I do.
I take a great deal of offense to this. Nobody in the group has
worked as hard on this project as I have over the last two years.
I
FWIW, I just noticed from my mirror that the 2.0 commit log is
now nearly 40MB in size.. compared to 1.3's 22MB. :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
"Apache Server for Dummies" http://Apache-Server.Com/
Greg Stein wrote:
I just added a task to STATUS, but I'm not sure that I parsed
your statement above properly. Here is what is now in STATUS:
* mod_dir should normally redirect ALL directory requests which do
not include a trailing slash on the URI. However, if a "notes"
Come on, people. This is a vote, not a soapbox. The only
topics relevant in this thread are votes, and queries from voters
about the differences (which have pretty much been asked
and answered; I think everyone has enough information to vote
now).
This is NOT the thread in which to discuss the
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
OLD_WRITE filter can be blown away not paying attention to
filter ordering.
Except that it would require conscious intent to accomplish
this, with Greg's internal-filter fix.
Greg's solution has the added bonus (IMHO) of not introducing
any more egregiously
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
If we do this for filters (which we will someday discover we
must, for similar reasons) then the user will be able to bump
up the ordering of any filter. Bump a little too much, and the
ordering is now scrambled.
Except that Greg's internal-filter type would
Consider the case of an existing (1.3) module that uses
ap_r*. The author's goal is to do as little as possible
to make it work under 2.0. It sounds as though the OLD_WRITE
solution will do this; he can leave all his content-related
calls along, and just upgrade the hooks. The macro option
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we implement ap_r?
[X] As a macro wrapper around ap_f* and the r-bb brigade
[ ] Using the OLD_WRITE filter
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
"Apache
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/02/22 01:28:51 $]
Release:
2.0b1 : Scheduled to release End of January, 2001
rbb volunteers to be RM
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 : released November
Dale Ghent wrote:
Correct or not, they are equivalent.
No, they are not.
Since they're equivalent, why is one more correct than the other?
Put in the perspective of something simpler; Is it better to
'cd /usr/' or 'cd /usr' ? Neither is better. They do and mean
the same thing.
For Unix
Greg Stein wrote:
Eh? How is that. If http://www.lyra.org/dav translates to a
directory in the filesystem, then what else can it possibly mean?
What if I want the actual contents of the directory file itself,
rather than the formatted metadata or the collection object?
Ken: go find the RFC
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Bah. I say follow the RFC. Apache is a reference implementation
of HTTP, and should do so in any event.
And what do you do when a paying customer says 'hey, this function
that 1000's of my customers depend on that used to work is now
broken'?
Apache *has* no
Jim Winstead wrote:
but hasn't the standard httpd solution to these things been to
implement something like 'nokeepalive' and introduce a BrowserMatch
line to the standard config to enable the incorrect behavior for
broken browsers?
*That* concept I can +1. As long as it is not the
"Dietz, Phil E." wrote:
- the allow_options_t size increased to a long because all 8 bits
of char were in use.
Ouch. I think that has killed changes to Options in the past.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't this remove the advantage of using apr_time_t's?
BTW, *please* do not quote the entire message, including the
patch, for responses like this..
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coarhttp://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
but we can't change the existing definition.
I do not think anyone is suggesting that. apr_time_t is 1uS
resolution. However, having to fetch that and throw away
six orders of magnitude precision, hundreds of times per
second, strikes me as just plain stupid.
83 matches
Mail list logo
