Re: memory allocation (was Re: mod_include performance numbers)

2001-04-22 Thread dean gaudet
can you give a short description of this allocator? -dean On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Greg Ames wrote: are you thinking about an atomic push/pop block allocator? I'll be happy to help out if so, especially with the machine instruction level stuff.

Re: memory allocation (was Re: mod_include performance numbers)

2001-04-21 Thread Greg Ames
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Greg Ames wrote: are you thinking about an atomic push/pop block allocator? I'll be happy to help out if so, especially with the machine instruction level stuff. Yes, I am, and I definitely *will* need help from various people getting the

Re: memory allocation (was Re: mod_include performance numbers)

2001-04-21 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, dean gaudet wrote: can you give a short description of this allocator? FirstBill wrote the beginnings of it. It's basically a drop-in replacement for malloc/calloc/free (really a wrapper around them) that, when initialized, pre-allocates blocks of various sizes (in