I'll look at it this afternoon once I've got some food in...
david
I have tagged and rolled 2.0.12, and they are currently in
dev.apache.org/dist.
Compiles on BeOS. (some of the support porgrams don't make it, though.)
Justin
Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still having problems with an incorrectly detected number of arguments
to sigwait on SunOS as of Friday, I think, and AFAIK no patches have gone
in to fix it. I know this was mentioned on the list earlier this week...
were any conclusions reached?
I see the fix is in for BeOS but in CVS the signal thread is stopping the
build for me. I'll try to cook something up.
david
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Havard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.12 ready for
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote:
configuring package in srclib/apr-util now
loading cache ../.././config.cache
.
checking for APR... /usr3/src/CVS/apr/include
checking how to run the C preprocessor... (cached) gcc -E
checking for chosen DBM type... sdbm
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
WTF? First of all, Webfolders is buggy because it should always be
including the trailing slash. How the brainiacs at Microsoft got that
one wrong is beyond me -- I personally explained to them that Apache
returns a 301 on any directory without a
And therein lies the biggest dilemma of all... do you follow the RFC's or
fix a Microsoft bug... my vote... follow the RFC's and comment the lines
where the patch needs to go and then show them what the patch is.
You now have achieved two critical things...
1. Followed the RFC's
2.
Well, I was hoping to get some feedback from Greg but the trivial patch
below will fix it (tested). Feel free to commit if there are no objections,
I'm going to bed (it's 1am here).
committed, thanks.
Ryan
___
Ryan
I am trying my best to close as many 2.0 bugs as possible. This bug is a
bit of a problem though, and I'm not sure what to do about it. It is
basically that we have a lot of warnings on IRIX. I have begun to look
into those warnings, by picking warnings at random and seeing what they
are.
And therein lies the biggest dilemma of all... do you follow the RFC's or
fix a Microsoft bug... my vote... follow the RFC's and comment the lines
where the patch needs to go and then show them what the patch is.
You now have achieved two critical things...
1. Followed the RFC's
2.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
And therein lies the biggest dilemma of all... do you follow the RFC's or
fix a Microsoft bug... my vote... follow the RFC's and comment the lines
where the patch needs to go and then show them what the patch is.
You now have achieved two
Okay, 2.0.13 is now dead since it won't work for Windows. I will not be
rolling again today, because I am on my way out the door. If somebody
else wants to test and then tag and roll, be my guest. My gut feeling is
that at this point we are better off waiting until later this week, when
On 25 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 01/02/25 12:53:42
Modified:.Apache.dsw Makefile.win
Log:
Bring in the expat.lib into the static aprutil.lib win32 library.
Fix up the build order that messed up command-line builds due to
the recent dependency
In a message dated 01-02-25 13:56:40 EST, Ryan writes...
I believe the solution to the first issue, is to tell the
compiler not to issue those warnings.
As far as 'unused arguments' goes... there are really only 2
options other than --Wdont_report_this_one
One is to just make the arguments
I see the fix is in for BeOS but in CVS the signal thread is stopping
the
build for me. I'll try to cook something up.
If it helps at this point, everything seems to be building successfully
on BeOS here, again.
Justin
+1
I spent 20 minutes pondering the same thing - but knew your or greg would have
ideas, issues and solutions.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 Apache.dsw
I have to agree. Regressing function that once worked, is usually a bad
idea.
Bill
Yep.
Just 'do the right thing' in the codebase and actually have a
patch hanging around ( and freely available ) called
'patch_to_do_the_wrong_thing_so_Webfolders_will_work.pat'.
That way... no one can
Not a problem. I was going to send mail, then thought "duh. why?" :-)
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 08:27:18PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thank you Greg, my bad.
gstein 01/02/24 18:17:19
Modified:support httpd.exp
Log:
fix typo
Revision ChangesPath
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 03:20:57PM +1000, Brian Havard wrote:
...
2.0.12 is broken on OS/2, caused by gsteins's inline handling patch. It's
pretty obscure though so I can't really blame Greg. The changes he made
stopped apr_general.h being included from util_uri.c which is where
strcasecmp()
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this on any version of Apache:
telnet localhost 8080
GET http://www.yahoo.com/ HTTP/1.0
This will get you the index of the current machine.
that is correct. and you'll get the index of the "current machine" (i.e.
default server) if you do
We've actually been talking about this one on the mod_dav mailing list (a
user of mod_dav 1.0 was trying to use Perl to examine the property files).
Similar to mod_ssl, I changed the "geometry" (great word) of the files to
allow for larger properties. (I dunno what mod_ssl stores in there, but
mod_autoindex still needs an overhaul.
-dean
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
Is there any way to set up non-recursive descriptions for autoindex?
I've even tried inclosing in 'FilesMatch "."' and similar hacks.
I'm trying to add descriptions some files in .htaccess's, however
trawick 01/02/25 15:22:36
Modified:include ap_release.h
Log:
nice to compile for a change
note that recent tags are FUBAR because this file was broken
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +1 -1 httpd-2.0/include/ap_release.h
Index: ap_release.h
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the real argument behing the whole typecasting
thing, anyway? It works.
typecasting hides typing problems. you can easily end up in situations
where you are truncating or extending integers without realising it.
it's much better to get the
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Then let us call it 'WorkersPerChild,' confound it! Or whatever
name we use for 'entity capable of serving a request'!
+1000.
it's 2.0, please make the configuration directives meaningful. i think i
had an XXX or TODO or somesuch comment
why do you start more than one process in the default configuration?
-dean
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Currently we *aim* to start up 250 worker threads by default (5 child
processes, 50 threads each). (We actually start more, but that can be
fixed easily enough :) )
That
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:14 PM
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Then let us call it 'WorkersPerChild,' confound it! Or whatever
name we use for 'entity capable of serving a request'!
+1000.
Make that +1001, if we are
Actually, apr-util doesn't depend on expat-lite. Apache just feeds a
--with-expat switch to it to say "use *this* Expat for building".
That was the shortest path towards a build for apr-util. Here are the four
alternatives we have:
1) continue with the ../expat-lite thang
2) toss Expat
hi,
i added a 'debug' target to apachectl for simplicity while debugging some
module stuff, just saves a couple keystrokes. thought people might find it
helpful. the diff to the 1.3.17 apachectl is attached.
basically, 'apachectl debug' starts httpd with -X, backgrounds the process,
and then
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) remove the --with-expat switch and add a copy of expat into apr-util/xml
(and remove httpd-2.0/srclib/expat-lite)
*) windows could just always use xml/expat/ (and the new one includes .dsp
files and whatnot)
*) autoconf'd systems
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Jonathan Day wrote:
IMHO, Apache is in danger of taking the same road. For certain
specific types of content, it's being out-classed. mod_ssl's EAPI
if you search through the archives you'll find that EAPI (and KEAPI) were
considered to be good ideas, but that they
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:14 PM
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Then let us call it 'WorkersPerChild,' confound it! Or whatever
name we use for 'entity capable of
Sounds like a great solution. _Please_ preserve the expat/libexpat .dsp/.mak
files while you are moving things around, it will save me much trouble later on.
I had given up on their .dsp files, and please leave the 'official' xmltok
and xmlparse .dsp/.mak files in that directory. We _won't_ use
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:51 PM
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:14 PM
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Then let us call
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
The type was apr_uint32_t and the format was %ld. Those are
compatible.
Um, do not some platforms define a 'long int' as 64 bits?
yup.
if you look at the C99 standard you'll see that stdint.h defines macros
for
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
The type was apr_uint32_t and the format was %ld. Those are
compatible.
Um, do not some platforms define a 'long int' as 64 bits?
yup.
if you look at the C99 standard
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:51 PM
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:14 PM
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rodent
i'm a bit of an I18N novice, but doesn't it all just magically work if you
use UTF-8 encoding everywhere?
UTF-8 deliberately avoids using \0 and / in the encodings. plain ascii
works unmodified. unix filesystems generally support UTF-8 directly
(because of the \0 and / avoidance).
this allows
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 7:42 PM
i'm a bit of an I18N novice, but doesn't it all just magically work if you
use UTF-8 encoding everywhere?
UTF-8 deliberately avoids using \0 and / in the encodings. plain ascii
works unmodified. unix
- On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: "dean gaudet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 6:14 PM
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Then let us call it 'WorkersPerChild,' confound it! Or whatever
name we use
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
| yes as you can see, redhat and dell wanted more performance than apache,
| or anything else in userland for that matter, could offer, so they created
| TUX. unfortunately everyone who isn't using linux will lose out... but
| WIN32 has SWC, and Sun has
This code fails:
Location /server-status
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from localhost
Allow from .rowe-clan.net
/Location
The result is always denied. Any ideas?
What happens when you place Allow from All at the bottom.
This code fails:
Location /server-status
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from localhost
Allow from .rowe-clan.net
/Location
The result is always denied. Any ideas?
Anyone else observe that mod_info, http_core.c section, reports
Directory /
Directory /
twice per Directory block? The contents aren't repeated, just
the start tag. (single end tag, as well.)
Works. Actually, I think it boils down to:
Allow from localhost
being broken on win32. s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ resolves the problem.
Since it's seeing the request from 127.0.0.1 it never parses out the
.rowe-clan.net allowance.
More experimenting to do. BTW... the ServerName 127.0.0.1 is for
put in Allow from 127.0.0.1
Works. Actually, I think it boils down to:
Allow from localhost
being broken on win32. s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ resolves the problem.
Since it's seeing the request from 127.0.0.1 it never parses out the
.rowe-clan.net allowance.
More experimenting to do. BTW...
From: "Bruce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 11:18 PM
put in Allow from 127.0.0.1
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough - yes 127.0.0.1 does work, localhost does not.
Seeing as localhost should parse through dns lookup, this would be a bug.
Works. Actually, I think it boils
Thanks, Greg. I didn't have perms to delete the link anyway.
On Sunday, February 25, 2001, at 04:48 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 11:07:21AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chuck 01/02/25 03:07:21
Removed: ..cvsignore
Log:
Nope - cvs
Then it will be a bug in your DNS setup rather than Apache.
Allow from localhost works fine normally. If Allow from 127... works,
but not Allow from localhost thats a DNS error.
And given that you are using Windows, there's a surprise :-)
Regards,
.
From: "Bruce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
From: "Bruce" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 11:50 PM
Then it will be a bug in your DNS setup rather than Apache.
Allow from localhost works fine normally. If Allow from 127... works,
but not Allow from localhost thats a DNS error.
And given that you are using Windows,
49 matches
Mail list logo
