On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
With a far greater understanding than I had 24 hours ago...
Is there any reason not to just _Drop_ the BindAddress directive and strictly
use the Listen directive for Apache 2.0?
I'd even go so far as depreciate the Port directive in favor
With a far greater understanding than I had 24 hours ago...
Is there any reason not to just _Drop_ the BindAddress directive and strictly
use the Listen directive for Apache 2.0?
I'd even go so far as depreciate the Port directive in favor of a more
decorated ServerName directive
"William A. Rowe, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With a far greater understanding than I had 24 hours ago...
Is there any reason not to just _Drop_ the BindAddress directive and strictly
use the Listen directive for Apache 2.0?
We already did as near as I can tell ("grep -i BindAddress" in
I'd even go so far as depreciate the Port directive in favor of a more
decorated ServerName directive (joespages.org:80) where port 80 is
assumed.
If we don't really need Port ('cause we don't need a port number in
addition to what is specified on the Listen statement), then I'm all
From: "Jeff Trawick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:15 AM
"William A. Rowe, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd even go so far as depreciate the Port directive in favor of a more
decorated ServerName directive (joespages.org:80) where port 80 is
assumed.
If we
