Re: [newbie] Installing Linux under Windows 3.1

2000-02-23 Thread Ramiro Aceves, EA1ABZ
Try an earlier version of Mandrake, such as 6.1, that is what I use in my 486 dx 2 66 MHz. I think 7.0 is compiled for pentium procesors. 73, Ramiro. Alex V Flinsch wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, you wrote: I have an old machine and I am trying to install Mandrake 7 on it. But when the

[newbie] Installing Linux under Windows 3.1

2000-02-20 Thread Bernd
I have an old machine and I am trying to install Mandrake 7 on it. But when the installation starts I get a error saying "No coprocessor found and no math emulation present. Giving up". I have an Intel 486 SX. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [[newbie] Installing Linux under Windows 3.1]

2000-02-20 Thread Michael Scottaline
Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an old machine and I am trying to install Mandrake 7 on it. But when the installation starts I get a error saying "No coprocessor found and no math emulation present. Giving up". I have an Intel 486 SX. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [newbie] Installing Linux under Windows 3.1

2000-02-20 Thread rjpeake
Hello To my knowledge, Mandrake 7 is meant ONLY for pentium class PC's. Ron Quoting Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have an old machine and I am trying to install Mandrake 7 on it. But when the installation starts I get a error saying "No coprocessor found and no math emulation present.

Re: [newbie] Installing Linux under Windows 3.1

2000-02-20 Thread sysads
] Installing Linux under Windows 3.1 Hello To my knowledge, Mandrake 7 is meant ONLY for pentium class PC's. Ron Quoting Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have an old machine and I am trying to install Mandrake 7 on it. But when the installation starts I get a error saying "No coproc