Re: [newbie] [OT] saw this one in Sridhar's sig

2002-02-15 Thread Ronald J. Hall
shane wrote: > > On Thursday 14 February 2002 18:03, you spoke unto me thusly: > > > Yes, this is entirely true. And this was supposed to be the most secure > > version yet. Silly Micro$oft ;) > > the act that it is true, does not change the fact that it IS microsofts > most secure ever

Re: [newbie] [OT] saw this one in Sridhar's sig

2002-02-14 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:56:07 -0500, "Anuerin G. Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -- > > Sridhar Dhanapalan > > > > "After you install Windows XP, you have the option to create user accounts. > > If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of > > Administrator

Re: [newbie] [OT] saw this one in Sridhar's sig

2002-02-14 Thread shane
On Thursday 14 February 2002 18:03, you spoke unto me thusly: > Yes, this is entirely true. And this was supposed to be the most secure > version yet. Silly Micro$oft ;) the act that it is true, does not change the fact that it IS microsofts most secure ever. -- "you can have peace or

[newbie] [OT] saw this one in Sridhar's sig

2002-02-14 Thread Anuerin G. Diaz
> -- > Sridhar Dhanapalan > > "After you install Windows XP, you have the option to create user accounts. If > you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of > Administrator with no password." -- Microsoft KnowledgeBase article Q293834 > > > hey, is this for real?