On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Michael O'Henly wrote:
The way I understand it, portsentry senses a port scan and then immediately
creates a rule that adds the scanning host to a REJECT or DENY rule. So if
you've told your firewall to do this by default for all external hosts, is
that the same thing?
It
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Michael O'Henly wrote:
My impression is that DrakConf's "internet connection sharing" command runs a
DHCP server and masquerades IPs. This is more than I need (DHCP) but it works
so I'll use it.
At http://mandrakeuser.org you can find a few simple tips to run internet
On Wednesday 27 December 2000 21:53, you wrote:
After setting up ipchains with pmfirewall's script, also find portsentry
and have that loaded. Works fine against port-attacks. Then you should be
reasonably safe.
Thanks for your reply. I'm interested that you run portsentry as well as
On Wednesday 27 December 2000 08:27 pm, Michael O'Henly wrote:
I've tested this
network with Shields Up and it does indeed appear not to be visible
to casual miscreants.
PMfirewall is available at ... http://www.pointman.org/
Shields Up is available at... https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:59:43 -0600, Tom Brinkman said:
On Wednesday 27 December 2000 08:27 pm, Michael O'Henly wrote:
I've tested this
network with Shields Up and it does indeed appear not to be visible
to casual miscreants.
PMfirewall is available at ... http://www.pointman.org/
On Thursday 28 December 2000 14:59, you wrote:
On Wednesday 27 December 2000 08:27 pm, Michael O'Henly wrote:
I've tested this
network with Shields Up and it does indeed appear not to be visible
to casual miscreants.
PMfirewall is available at ... http://www.pointman.org/
Shields Up is
Hi...
I've installed LM7.2 with "medium" security. I would have chosen a higher
level but I found LM's documentation on security unclear and confusing.
I know that I need to close some ports -- and I also want to use my Linux
host to masquerade IPs for a couple of other machines. Ideally, I'd
