Re: [newbie] Fastest X for linux to use?

2000-10-13 Thread Mwinold
well if you want memory i suggest you dont use x! it will take up memory so far gnome has 3 different versions that i see and then you have kde, i find gnome enlightenment keeps things simple but it runs alot of aplets, kde runs god knows what and through all the bickering i herd i have ran

Re: [newbie] Fastest X for linux to use?

2000-10-12 Thread Mark Weaver
MarkO I've found IceWM to be very easy on resources and is quite nice to look at and operate. -- Mark ...Larry isn't a cucumber. He's a PICKLE... ...WITH WARTS! Surprisingly on Wed, 11 Oct 2000 markOpoleO had this to say! I was wodnering which uses less resources for linux, i heard

Re: [newbie] Fastest X for linux to use?

2000-10-12 Thread freeman
I was wodnering which uses less resources for linux, i heard Windowsmaker used only a few megs, while KDE used like 20 megs to run. I am planing on running some Memory intensive stuff in Linux and would like the fast most Resource freindly one out there. Also a few suggestions of web

Re: [newbie] Fastest X for linux to use?

2000-10-12 Thread Paul
It was Oct 12, 2000, 09:50, when Mark Weaver keyboarded: MarkO I've found IceWM to be very easy on resources and is quite nice to look at and operate. I was wodnering which uses less resources for linux, i heard Windowsmaker used only a few megs, while KDE used like 20 megs to run. I am

[newbie] Fastest X for linux to use?

2000-10-11 Thread markOpoleO
I was wodnering which uses less resources for linux, i heard Windowsmaker used only a few megs, while KDE used like 20 megs to run. I am planing on running some Memory intensive stuff in Linux and would like the fast most Resource freindly one out there. Also a few suggestions of web browsers