Re: Fwd: Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-04 Thread etharp
so, Joe, can we count on you to be the resident win-modem in Mandrake at newbie helper? what we REALLY need is someone to help out all the winmodem owner/newbies when they write. Can I give them your e-mail address should they not receive a positive responce within say 48 hours? bigga snip

Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-03 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001 22:48:31 -0500, Joseph Braddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you telling me that by hooking up an external modem through a serial port, it's not taking any CPU cycles? Somehow, something in my computer has to read that port and process the data to get it to my browser,

Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-03 Thread etharp
snip Joethe real winmodem problem is better explained below by the two selected quotes from Rick Moen's linuxmafia.com website: http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/ good link, thanks 'nother snip Theoretically, programmers could write substitute engine software for non-MS-Windows

Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-03 Thread Alan Shoemaker
etharp wrote: snip Joethe real winmodem problem is better explained below by the two selected quotes from Rick Moen's linuxmafia.com website: http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/ good link, thanks You're quite welcome. :) 'nother snip Theoretically, programmers could write

Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-03 Thread Ric
Alan Shoemaker wrote: etharp wrote: snip Joethe real winmodem problem is better explained below by the two selected quotes from Rick Moen's linuxmafia.com website: http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/ The link is well worth a vist. Also, to put this in a better light for those that

RE: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-03 Thread Rafael Lepra
-Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Ric Enviado el: miƩrcoles, 03 de octubre de 2001 17:07 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems Alan Shoemaker wrote: etharp wrote: snip Joethe real winmodem problem is better

Fwd: Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-03 Thread Joseph Braddock
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 03:06 pm, you wrote: Winmodems were produced to accomplish 2 things: 1) Reduce the cost of computers by reducing the cost of the components. Winmodems are much less expensive to produce since they lack the circuitry of a real modem. It's basically just a

Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-02 Thread Joseph Braddock
Are you telling me that by hooking up an external modem through a serial port, it's not taking any CPU cycles? Somehow, something in my computer has to read that port and process the data to get it to my browser, email, or hard drive. It might not use as much CPU cycles, but it uses some.

Re: [newbie] MODEMS vs Winmodems

2001-10-01 Thread Ric Tibbetts
You've actually missed the point about winmodems. It's not that they need a driver to work (If they'll work at all). The problem with them is that they shift the work that normally done by the modem, over to the main system processor, thus sucking valuable CPU cycles. They're parasitic by