Thanks to all who sent their response to my question. I have another question, I think
this is a ridiculous question, but I have nothing to do but to ask this question just
to know, I know that if we compile a program like an assembly program, it will make
another file excluding the source
will make an exe file. If it so, why is it that most of the files in Linux
has no extension name, particularly no executable file like in windows
e.g. (scandisk.exe)?
The extensions are a Windows thing and don't in any way apply to linux. A
program (or file) can be executable simply by
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 17:15, Anthony V Guillen wrote:
Thanks to all who sent their response to my question. I have another question, I
think this is a ridiculous question, but I have nothing to do but to ask this
question just to know, I know that if we compile a program like an assembly
Is there any difference in the syntax and the compiler use in c programming assembly
programming in windows and in linux? or the compiler itself?
__
www.edsamail.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Thu, 04 Apr 2002, Anthony V Guillen wrote:
%_Is there any difference in the syntax and the compiler use in c programming
assembly programming in windows and in linux? or the compiler itself?
As a rule syntax is ANSI 'C'.
Why do you ask?
Linux uses gcc, usually windows uses visualk C++
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 18:19, Anthony V Guillen wrote:
Is there any difference in the syntax and the compiler use in c programming
assembly programming in windows and in linux? or the compiler itself?
Yes, there are large differences. gcc is closer to ANSI compliant, but
has all sorts of
