On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 18:58, Todd Slater wrote:
> In ROX, right-click the file, Set run action, and type the name (or full
> path if the app isn't in your path) of the program you want to use. I use
> gedit for quick edits in gui. You can also drag and drop the executable to
> if you prefer.
>
> T
On 10 Feb 2003 18:14:39 -0700
FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 16:36, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> OK... so whats the real diff between those 2 editors & which
> > >> one is more
> > >> newb friendly? If neither is newbie friendly, well name
> > >> somethin
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 16:36, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> OK... so whats the real diff between those 2 editors & which
> >> one is more
> >> newb friendly? If neither is newbie friendly, well name
> >> something that
> >> is and is more or less standard on most *nix's.
>
>
> How ab
Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
On Tue 2003-02-04 at 21:21:06 -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[... cool overview about available editors ...]
If I am on a desktop and I need a quick edit, I usually grab for
kedit, but any heavy work is emacs unless it is a sudoers file in
which case a special variant
civileme wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2003 06:46 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
Anders Lind wrote:
OK I just read some stuff about VI & Emacs. Now I'm not one for super
complex editors of text. Having said that I realize it behooves me
(Correct context for "behooves?" & sp!?) to learn one or the o
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 20:32:02 -0900
civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But really I have always felt trapped in these discussions. I don't
Me too!!
> believe there is really enough common ground to compare them. emacs
> is easier to get started with thanks to the tutorial built in, and vi
>
Jan Wilson wrote:
* FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030205 01:27]:
[snip]
edit files on any system. I realized a while back those 2 editors are
standard to Any *nix environment.
I believe that emacs is not always installed, even though it is
probably available for almost all OSes and
