Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-04 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 12:18 am, Erylon Hines wrote: The source server (running Unix) is FIXED. Yes, it was on his end (fortunately the sysadmin is a personal friend, so he was very willing to check out the code and find out what was wrong). Glad to hear it - both the fix and the

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-03 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 03 Sep 2003 2:04 am, Erylon Hines wrote: Because it's my WIFE'S e-mail account and she is xenophobic about it. I had a hell of a time getting her switched to Linux in the first place, so changing e-mail clients is TOTALLY OUT OF THE QUESTION. Fixing it is the only option. If

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-02 Thread Peter Stokes
Hi e On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:15, Erylon Hines wrote: Still no clues on how to fix this, or even what is causing the problem, but thanks for the insite, so far. Why not try using another email client temporarily and then that will decide if it is your system or maybe the date info has

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-02 Thread Erylon Hines
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:29 am, Peter Stokes wrote: Hi e On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:15, Erylon Hines wrote: Still no clues on how to fix this, or even what is causing the problem, but thanks for the insite, so far. Why not try using another email client temporarily and then that will

[newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Erylon Hines
O.K. guys, help me solve this. My wife gets forwarded messages from a server for a group that she belongs to. Each one of these has the date, Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM The sending server's date is correct and sends it out correctly (at least the admin thinks so, although the format

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:17:57 +0100 Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted: On Monday 01 Sep 2003 3:49 am, Erylon Hines wrote: O.K. guys, help me solve this. My wife gets forwarded messages from a server for a group that she belongs to. Each one of these has the date, Wednesday 31

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 3:49 am, Erylon Hines wrote: O.K. guys, help me solve this. My wife gets forwarded messages from a server for a group that she belongs to. Each one of these has the date, Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM The sending server's date is correct and sends it out correctly

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Erylon Hines
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 3:49 am, Erylon Hines wrote: O.K. guys, help me solve this. My wife gets forwarded messages from a server for a group that she belongs to. Each one of these has the date, Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM Other people on her list get the correct date with

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Andy Davidson
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 06:15:21AM -0400, Erylon Hines wrote: O.K., then Kmail isn't reading the hardware clock for the date stamp. But I thought Jan 1, 1970 was the beginning of Unix Time, so where does Dec 31, 1969 4:00PM fit into the picture? I can't answer the other problems, but I

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Erylon Hines
On Monday 01 September 2003 07:50 am, Michael Scottaline wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:17:57 +0100 Isn't the December, 1969 date the beginning of Unix Time??? Mike O.K., then Kmail isn't reading the hardware clock for the date stamp. But I thought Jan 1, 1970 was the beginning of

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 11:15 am, Erylon Hines wrote: On Monday 01 Sep 2003 3:49 am, Erylon Hines wrote: O.K. guys, help me solve this. My wife gets forwarded messages from a server for a group that she belongs to. Each one of these has the date, Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

Re: [newbie] Wednesday 31 December, 1969 4:00PM

2003-09-01 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 01 Sep 2003 12:06 pm, Erylon Hines wrote: On Monday 01 September 2003 07:50 am, Michael Scottaline wrote: O.K. I can answer my own question here. Dec 31, 1969 4:00 PM is GMT minus the sender's meridian (which happens to also be my own). Jan 1, 1970 00:00 minus 8 hours equals the