RE: [newbie] a very dumb gcc question

2001-11-29 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] a very dumb gcc question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Newbie Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] a very dumb gcc question Ok, its stupid question time. Ok, I'm

Re: [newbie] a very dumb gcc question

2001-11-29 Thread Mark D'voo
have you tried rpm --oldpackage gcc-2.95*.rpm this should let you downgrade. an rpm --force will also do this, but I'd recommend rpm --oldpackage to check for deps first. If all else fails, rebuild from source mark On Friday 30 November 2001 01:40, you wrote: Ok, its stupid question time.

Re: [newbie] a very dumb gcc question

2001-11-29 Thread Newbie
rebuild from source? compile a compiler? If I don't have a compiler that works, how can I compile? On Thursday 29 November 2001 09:15 am, you wrote: have you tried rpm --oldpackage gcc-2.95*.rpm this should let you downgrade. an rpm --force will also do this, but I'd recommend rpm

Re: [newbie] a very dumb gcc question

2001-11-29 Thread skidley
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Newbie wrote: Ok, its stupid question time. Ok, I'm no expert, but I'm not a complete newbie, but I still don't know, should I force install GCC2.95 to end my GCC3 compiler troubles? Or am I skrude until the next mandrake release? I can't seem to backgrade to some