shane said onto me:
shane> --
shane> Nimda virus affects Linux! My linux boxes have had their bandwidth chewed
shane> up by four thousand Nimda servers infected with IIS.
I remember Nimda! I was running a 14 server-175 workstation NT network when it hit.
Thank _you_ for th
On Thursday 28 March 2002 05:25 am, civileme opened a hailing frequency and
transmitted:
> OK, for a while, hard disks remained small. I remember thinking an 80M
> unit was huge(yes, 80 M not 80G). Then as the capacity of the CHS
thank you for that painful flash back to my 40MB drive. backin
On Wednesday 27 March 2002 08:37 pm, Baka Attila Tamás opened a hailing
frequency and transmitted:
> The bug is probably with the "southbridge" chip on your motherboard. Too
> bad you have an AMD CPU :-( The same thing happened to a friend of mine.
> There is a patch for this somewhere on the ne
? :-
BAT
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shane
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Crashes unlimited
On Wednesday 27 March 2002 08:37 pm, Baka Attila Tamás opened a hailing
frequency and transmitted
Title: RE: [newbie] Crashes unlimited
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Baka Attila Tamás
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Crashes unlimited
The bug is probably with the
The bug is probably with the "southbridge" chip on your motherboard. Too bad
you have an AMD CPU :-( The same thing happened to a friend of mine. There
is a patch for this somewhere on the net I think. 8.2 works fine with
Intel...
BAT
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mai
B.O. Jone wrote:
>Hi,
> I wound up here after wondering around in search of a
>miracle hand over my ailing Mandrake.
> 8.2 certainly laid a good foundation for linux future
>development ahead of all other distros. But I have one
>cripling problem on my system: crashes everywhere.
> Crashes come d
Ben,
Sounds like you might have some bad memory. Were you using a previous
version of Linux, or has this machine had W$ only on it before this?
Reason for asking is that W$ will not necessarily use all the memory,
while Linux will.
Either way, I would suggest trying memtest86 for a while.
Bri
