When I was setting up my website (http://www.drewvogel.com), I initially selected PHPNuke (5.0, 5.01, 5.20) and ran it for a while.
Once I evaluated PostNuke, it became clear that PostNuke was the right choice for my site... It offered some small features unavailable in PHPNuke that were important to me, so I switched. I've been very happy with PostNuke and intend to continue running it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [newbie] PHPnuke or Postnuke > > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:26:28 -0500 > "William R. Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was playing with PHPnuke 5.5 today. I like the way it works but > > some of my friends told me to use postnuke that it was better then > > PHPnuke. I was wondering which is better phpnuke 5.5 or > Postnuke 7.1. > > > > Bill Nash > > If you're shopping for a content management system, you might > also look into Geeklog (http://geeklog.sourceforge.net/) or > phpwebsite (http://phpwebsite.appstate.edu/). I didn't do a > ton of research on it, but what I read suggested that Geeklog > was more secure than the nukes. I installed it and was pretty > pleased, but I can't compare it to either > nuke.-- > Todd Slater > 10:25pm up 1 day, 23:52, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.11, > 0.10 The man who does not read good books has no advantage > over the man who can't read them. (Mark Twain) > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
