On Monday 20 January 2003 03:30 pm, you wrote:
> On Mon, January 20 2003 5:21 pm, robin wrote:
> *super.snip*
>
> > I see the detoxification process is complete. Maybe we should have a
> > 12-step program for Windows dependency. It should start with everyone
> > getting up and saying "My name is
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 07:08, John Richard Smith wrote:
yes, I guess so.After all many server systems run on linux software.It
cannot all be
due to money. I just wondered how much file systems had to do with this,
because
for instance , while my w2k on ntfs runs a whole l
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 21:05, John Richard Smith wrote:
In your experience is it still the case, I mean you mention NT servers
were unreliable
as against linux server boxes. I have no personal experience whatsoever.
John
Let's put it this way - I always setup a sche
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 21:05, John Richard Smith wrote:
> In your experience is it still the case, I mean you mention NT servers
> were unreliable
> as against linux server boxes. I have no personal experience whatsoever.
>
> John
Let's put it this way - I always setup a scheduled task on an NT
> On Monday 20 January 2003 05:17 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> > Send them klez for giggles and grins
Stephen, please send me one (off-list) to play with.
Kaj Haulrich.
===
Powered by Linux- Mandrake 9.0
Registered Linux user # 2
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:55, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
Hi All,
I believe, windows 2000,is a relatively stable OS for desktop uses. I use it
at work, and it does not need a reboot as often as NT 4.0 used to.
BTW, Yesterday's newspaper (here in New Delhi) carried an ad from Micro
On Tuesday 21 Jan 2003 3:55 am, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> Hi All,
> I believe, windows 2000,is a relatively stable OS for desktop uses. I use
> it at work, and it does not need a reboot as often as NT 4.0 used to.
I found W2K relatively stable, but drivers were as big a problem as linux
drivers (m
On Monday 20 Jan 2003 11:30 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Mon, January 20 2003 5:21 pm, robin wrote:
> *super.snip*
>
> > I see the detoxification process is complete. Maybe we should have a
> > 12-step program for Windows dependency. It should start with everyone
> > getting up and saying "My name
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 19:33, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
> You lucky man, you!
> I never get to do more than point 8.
> By then they've either gone completely off their rocker or are starting to
> foam at the mouth.
> What really kills 'm is when they need to get on to the internet for their
> nifty mo
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 00:17, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 11:02, Chuck Burns wrote:
> > On Mon, January 20 2003 5:50 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> > *snip*
> >
> > > (And she's a soon-to-be linux user, ya reckon Chuck?)
> >
> > She uses it all the time, at my house, I just havent ye
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:55, Kesav Tadimeti wrote:
> Hi All,
> I believe, windows 2000,is a relatively stable OS for desktop uses. I use it
> at work, and it does not need a reboot as often as NT 4.0 used to.
> BTW, Yesterday's newspaper (here in New Delhi) carried an ad from Microsoft
> claiming t
On Monday 20 January 2003 05:17 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 11:02, Chuck Burns wrote:
> > On Mon, January 20 2003 5:50 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> > *snip*
> >
> > > (And she's a soon-to-be linux user, ya reckon Chuck?)
> >
> > She uses it all the time, at my house, I just havent
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 11:02, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Mon, January 20 2003 5:50 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> *snip*
> > (And she's a soon-to-be linux user, ya reckon Chuck?)
> She uses it all the time, at my house, I just havent yet convinced her to
> forgoe her ill-begotten ways, and evil tendencenci
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 10:30, Chuck Burns wrote:
> On Mon, January 20 2003 5:21 pm, robin wrote:
> *super.snip*
> >
> > I see the detoxification process is complete. Maybe we should have a
> > 12-step program for Windows dependency. It should start with everyone
> > getting up and saying "My name
On Mon, January 20 2003 5:21 pm, robin wrote:
*super.snip*
>
> I see the detoxification process is complete. Maybe we should have a
> 12-step program for Windows dependency. It should start with everyone
> getting up and saying "My name is ..., and I'm a Windows user." I must
> admit I haven't k
15 matches
Mail list logo
