On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 10:00, Robert Wideman wrote:
> And yes i do apologize about the ID10T thing.
Apology accepted... I am not normally hyper-sensitive, but the ID-10-T
thing really gets to me, as I work in a NOC providing 2nd and 3rd level
support and the only time I ever hear this joke is when
Robert Wideman wrote:
Please be a bit more patient with people on this list. I still haven't
gotten over the id10t error statement that you made to someone on this
list a while ago.
Dood that was a IT Industry joke. Get over it. I do ID-10-T issues all the
time. I even do PEPKAC issues myself.
>> Please be a bit more patient with people on this list. I still haven't
>> gotten over the id10t error statement that you made to someone on this
>> list a while ago.
Dood that was a IT Industry joke. Get over it. I do ID-10-T issues all the
time. I even do PEPKAC issues myself. I just get ov
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 00:24, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> Are you talking about a chroot environment?
>
> Have you used UML? It sure doesnt sound like it.
Do you know what Robert? This is a newbie list, so chances are he hasn't
used UML...
Please be a bit more patient with people on this list.
>> Are you talking about a chroot environment?
Have you used UML? It sure doesnt sound like it.
Its a virtual machine (OS) inside file.
Just like VMWare but better (depending on what your doing).
Its built into the kernel and it has its own filesystem and everything.
http://user-mode-linux.so
