Re: [newbie] Renew gpg key

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Fajar, On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:08:31 +0700, Fajar Priyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about [newbie] Renew gpg key: Dear all, I've just realized that today my gpg key is expired. How do I renew it without importing and signing all my friends' key

Re: [newbie-it] gpg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alle 21:33, lunedì 16 giugno 2003, miKe ha scritto: Alle 23:42, domenica 15 giugno 2003, in merito a Re: [newbie-it] ... hai già provato a dare gpg --edit-key .. e quindi segnare l' uid che vuoi come predefinito con 'uid 3 ' e dargli 'primary'

Re: [newbie-it] gpg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alle 23:42, domenica 15 giugno 2003, in merito a Re: [newbie-it] gpg, Luigi Pinna ha scritto: Alle 01:01, domenica 15 giugno 2003, miKe ha scritto: Alle 02:51, giovedì 12 giugno 2003, in merito a [newbie-it] gpg, Luigi Pinna ha

Re: [newbie-it] gpg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alle 01:01, domenica 15 giugno 2003, miKe ha scritto: Alle 02:51, giovedì 12 giugno 2003, in merito a [newbie-it] gpg, Luigi Pinna ha scritto: Come faccio? lo fa solo con l'identità principale!!! Nel senso che non mi firma più con

[newbie-it] gpg

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ciao a tutti! Siccome possiedo diversi account email e ho deciso che era più semplice creare diverse chiavi private, mi ritrovo ora con 3 chiavi private e altrettante pubbliche. Il problema nasce dal fatto che Kmail mi sta firmando in una cartella

Re: [newbie] No GPG signature?

The risks may be small, but last year the openssh project site (I think it was openssh) was hacked and a malicious .tar.gz file was substituted in the download area. It was about a week before anyone noticed. To put someones gpg identity on your key ring. Download their public key which

Re[2]: [newbie] No GPG signature?

Hello eric, Monday, June 2, 2003, 11:20:10 PM, you wrote: eh I asked the same ? and a couple people said not to worry about it if it was eh from one of the known/respected sites. I guess it would depend on just eh how paranoid you are I have a large amount of valuable-to-me info on my

[newbie] No GPG signature?

Hello, I downloaded sylpheed from a contrib mirror, and during the install I get a message 'No GPG signature in package'. Does this imply a security risk in installing the package? I didn't get this in 9.0. Is this a new check in 9.1 or is the package really different? Thanks. -- Best regards,

Re: [newbie] No GPG signature?

I asked the same ? and a couple people said not to worry about it if it was from one of the known/respected sites. I guess it would depend on just how paranoid you are If the sig is borked (ie you actually did download the key, the package has one, *and* you get an error) that might be a

Re: [newbie] No GPG signature?

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:34:12 -0700 rikona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded sylpheed from a contrib mirror, and during the install I get a message 'No GPG signature in package'. Does this imply a security risk in installing the package? I didn't get this in 9.0. Is this a new check in 9.1

Re: [newbie] RPM GPG.

On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 17:06, Seedkum Aladeem wrote: Hi, I was trying to install an rpm package using the software installer that came with LM9.0 and its KDE gui. Using Konqueror, I right clicked on the rpm package on the source ftp site then I selected software installer from the pop-up

[newbie] RPM GPG.

Hi, I was trying to install an rpm package using the software installer that came with LM9.0 and its KDE gui. Using Konqueror, I right clicked on the rpm package on the source ftp site then I selected software installer from the pop-up window. A short while later I got this message No GPG