“It’s certainly true,” remarked Chomsky, in a November 10th interview with
Bill Maher, “that the world is better off without Saddam Hussein.” Now, this
might be comforting to Americans who have doubts about the legitimacy of the
Anglo-American invasion of Iraq (hey, everyone’s better off without Saddam,
so what’s all the fuss about?) and it may be considered the kind of thing
you say to settle the question “Is he or isn’t he soft on brutal monsters?”
but as a statement, it’s meaningless. 

Obviously, the guy who was next in line on Hussein’s execution list is
better off, while the guy next in line on his promotions list isn’t (since
he’s probably now languishing in a US military prison in Baghdad, being
forced to masturbate for the amusement of prison guards.) As for the rest of
the world, it’s meaningless to talk of whether the end of Saddam Hussein is
for the good or bad without talking about what comes after.

Full: http://gowans.blogspot.com/2005/01/noam-chomskys-rogues-gallery.html






                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        news@antic.org

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to