A great step forward by the Times. Let's use it to push Holder toward proper treatment of Don's case. (Throwing out the case, and starting an investigation of all those who forced it, would be proper treatment.)
And let's also use it to induce the Times to call for "a thorough investigation" of the hundreds of selective prosecutions by Rove's DoJ. MCM The Siegelman Case The New York Times Editorial April 25, 2009 <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/opinion/25sat4.html>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/25/opinion/25sat4.html Attorney General Eric Holder's recent decision to drop all of the charges against Ted Stevens, the former Republican senator from Alaska, because of prosecutorial misconduct raises an important question: What about Don Siegelman? A bipartisan group of 75 former state attorneys general has written to Mr. Holder asking him to take a fresh look at the former Alabama governor's case. He should do so right away. Mr. Siegelman was convicted in 2006 on dubious corruption charges. He spent nine months in prison before being released on appeal, and he faces years more behind bars. He has long insisted that the case against him was politically motivated and that prosecutors engaged in an array of professional and ethical violations. Many aspects of the case require further scrutiny. United States Attorney Leura Canary is the wife of a prominent Republican political operative who was a strong opponent of Mr. Siegelman. Her office prosecuted Mr. Siegelman. Ms. Canary said that she recused herself from the prosecution, but questions have been raised about whether she actually did. Mr. Siegelman's supporters have long argued that he was targeted by the Justice Department because he was Alabama's leading Democratic politician and stood a good chance of once again being elected governor [as he had been in 2002: a victory that was stolen from him--MCM.] A Republican lawyer in Alabama, Jill Simpson, has said that she heard Ms. Canary's husband, William Canary, say that he had discussed the prosecution with Karl Rove, the senior White House political adviser. In the case of Mr. Stevens, who was convicted of felony charges for failing to disclose gifts and services, Mr. Holder was so troubled by the way the prosecution was carried out that he decided to drop the case entirely. According to the Siegelman camp, at least three of the same officials who have been accused of prosecutorial misconduct in the Stevens case were involved in Mr. Siegelman's prosecution. If true, this alone would seem to justify a thorough investigation of the case. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to Mark Crispin Miller's "News From Underground" newsgroup. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to newsfromunderground-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com OR go to http://groups.google.com/group/newsfromunderground and click on the "Unsubscribe or change membership" link in the yellow bar at the top of the page, then click the "Unsubscribe" button on the next page. For more News From Underground, visit http://markcrispinmiller.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
