Yup, will do. Was going to do it over the weekend, but got tied up.
Matt
- "Frank Filz" wrote:
> Looks like we can clear all of these. I think they should mostly all
> be marked as intentional, our use of flags to control when lock/unlock
> is done is hard for an automated tool to follow (
Looks like we can clear all of these. I think they should mostly all be marked
as intentional, our use of flags to control when lock/unlock is done is hard
for an automated tool to follow (it's not even always that clear to me... I
wish in some cases we would use functions like foo_locked that a
> On 7/12/15 8:05 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> Noting that I've had for some weeks (Jun 19) a replacement for
> SVC_RELEASE() that uses an inline function instead.
> Coverity seems to be better with inline, so this will probably go away on its
> own.
>
> That patch happens to be called:
>
