Branch next
Tag:V2.4-rc1
We are in the final throes before tagging V2.4.0. There are a few items
that are still on the docket, but this should be ready for significant
testing.
Release Highlights
* Resolved a number of Coverity issues
* FSAL_GPFS converted to support_ex
* Some FSAL_UP issues
Please merge them, I will do more testing next week.
Thanks, Marc.
From: "Frank Filz"
To: Marc Eshel/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: "'NFS Ganesha Developers'"
Date: 08/26/2016 09:58 AM
Subject:RE: Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: Add blocking locks
to multi-fd.
Do you feel li
Do you feel like your patches are ready to go yet, or do you need more
work/testing before I merge them?
Thanks
Frank
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-
> Let's fork the discussions to the list, I think more people will see it there
> and
> it's a bit more comfortable to make argumented discussions...
>
>
> First, my point on the subject is that we have two reasons to switch:
> - our default secType is sys, and that really is as weak as it gets
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:14:56PM -0500, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> When you run your cmake, it creates nfs-ganesha.spec file. If you have
>
> %bcond_with ceph
> %global use_fsal_ceph %{on_off_switch ceph}
>
> in your spec file, you won't get ceph by default. If you have
> "%bcond_without ceph" th
Let's fork the discussions to the list, I think more people will see it
there and it's a bit more comfortable to make argumented discussions...
First, my point on the subject is that we have two reasons to switch:
- our default secType is sys, and that really is as weak as it gets.
My personal d
