Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesha for Ubuntu

2017-02-02 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
It was in the tree, and was removed because Debian doesn't like having it in tree: https://review.gerrithub.io/282996 Daniel On 02/02/2017 09:40 AM, Swen Schillig wrote: > On Do, 2017-02-02 at 15:24 +0100, Swen Schillig wrote: >> Frank, Kaleb >> >> Is there a reason why we don't have the ganesh

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesha for Ubuntu

2017-02-02 Thread Swen Schillig
On Do, 2017-02-02 at 15:24 +0100, Swen Schillig wrote: > Frank, Kaleb > > Is there a reason why we don't have the ganesha tree prepared to > build > packages for Ubuntu ? > > Kaleb, I know you're maintaining a separate repository for this, > but I'm not really sure why it's part of the ganesha tr

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesha for Ubuntu

2017-02-02 Thread Swen Schillig
Frank, Kaleb Is there a reason why we don't have the ganesha tree prepared to build packages for Ubuntu ? Kaleb, I know you're maintaining a separate repository for this, but I'm not really sure why it's part of the ganesha tree? I've seen a few people being interested in those buildsĀ  on our ma

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: MDCACHE: only remove cached entry on unlink on success

2017-02-02 Thread GerritHub
>From Dominique Martinet : Dominique Martinet has uploaded a new change for review. ( https://review.gerrithub.io/346324 Change subject: MDCACHE: only remove cached entry on unlink on success .. MDCACHE: only remove cached ent