On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:18:52AM -0800, Frank Filz wrote:
> Ah, that might be an issue. It’s hard to gets POSIX<->NFS V4 ACL
> conversion as best as possible (again, impossible to make it perfect,
> even for POSIX->NFS V4).
Well, POSIX->NFSv4 should be very close to perfect. (Name mapping might
Frank
From: Sagar M D [mailto:sagar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:12 PM
To: Sriram Patil
Cc: Frank Filz ; Supriti Singh
; nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ACL support
Hi,
Kernel nfs reorders the ACE in ACL and i thin
, then you will need the translation
>> code from FSAL_GLUSTER (or write your own).
>>
>>
>>
>> I’d also like to add my usual plug, if you have an out of tree FSAL, we
>> encourage you to submit your FSAL into the tree. That allows us a better
>> u
You can
> find these commands in nfs4-acl-tools package.
>
>
>
> - Sriram
>
>
>
> *From: *Sagar M D
> *Date: *Friday, February 16, 2018 at 3:20 PM
> *To: *Supriti Singh
> *Cc: *"nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" sourceforge.net>
> *Subje
vel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: RE: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ACL support
It isn’t quite true that NFS v4 ACLs are a superset of POSIX ACLs, but that’s
another detail.
Sriram is right, Ganesha doesn’t support the NFS v3 sideband protocol for POSIX
ACLs. At this point Ganesha has the following s
>fsal_check_access_acl.
>
>
>
> - Sriram
>
>
>
> *From: *Frank Filz
> *Date: *Friday, February 16, 2018 at 8:19 PM
> *To: *Sriram Patil , 'Sagar M D' ,
> 'Supriti Singh'
> *Cc: *"nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" sou
; Supriti Singh
Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ACL support
Hi Sagar,
I see in your conf file that you are using NFSv4. POSIX acls do not work on
NFSv4. NFSv4 acls are a superset of POSIX acls. For using NFSv4 acls you need
to use nfs4_getfacl and
From: Sagar M D
Date: Friday, February 16, 2018 at 3:20 PM
To: Supriti Singh
Cc: "nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] ACL support
I quickly checked on VFS FSAL using below EXPORT block. I see same issue on vfs
fsal also. Any suggestion h
I quickly checked on VFS FSAL using below EXPORT block. I see same issue on
vfs fsal also. Any suggestion here please ?
*Operation to request attribute not supported.Failed to instantiate ACL.*
EXPORT
{
Export_Id = 77;
# Exported path (mandatory)
Path = /home;
# Pseudo Path (r
Supriti,
We are testing our own FSAL.
Thanks,
Sagar.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Supriti Singh
wrote:
> Hi Sagar,
>
> Which FSAL are you using?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Supriti Singh
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>
> >>> Sagar
Hi Sagar,
Which FSAL are you using?
--
Supriti Singh SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham
Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>>> Sagar M D 02/16/18 9:15 AM >>>
Hi,
We are setting below value in our EXPORT block to enable ACL.
Disable_ACL = FALSE;
However w
Hi,
We are setting below value in our EXPORT block to enable ACL.
*Disable_ACL = FALSE;*
However when try to do any ACL operation it throws get below error:-
*Operation to request attribute not supported.Failed to instantiate ACL.*
On further analysis, i found that getattr call on our fsal exp
12 matches
Mail list logo
