Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] About FSAL_GLUSTER performance

2017-07-21 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 7/21/17 6:19 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote: On 21/07/17 13:11, gui mark wrote: Hi all (cc maintainers), We've tried a performance test comparing nfs-ganesha and gNFS from gluster, we found that gNFS out performs nfs-ganesha by nearly 2 times on OPS. As I read throught the code

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] About FSAL_GLUSTER performance

2017-07-21 Thread Jiffin Tony Thottan
On 21/07/17 13:11, gui mark wrote: Hi all (cc maintainers), We've tried a performance test comparing nfs-ganesha and gNFS from gluster, we found that gNFS out performs nfs-ganesha by nearly 2 times on OPS. As I read throught the code FSAL_GLUSTER now adopts sync api from libgfapi, is

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] About FSAL_GLUSTER performance

2017-07-21 Thread Matt Benjamin
Hi Mark, As a matter of fact that is one of a bunch of perf and async/non-blocking changes being worked on for 2.6 and later releases. Soumya is the person currently working on gfapi async. Matt On Jul 21, 2017 3:43 AM, "gui mark" wrote: > Hi all (cc maintainers), >

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] About FSAL_GLUSTER performance

2017-07-21 Thread gui mark
Hi all (cc maintainers), We've tried a performance test comparing nfs-ganesha and gNFS from gluster, we found that gNFS out performs nfs-ganesha by nearly 2 times on OPS. As I read throught the code FSAL_GLUSTER now adopts sync api from libgfapi, is there any plan to switch to the *_async ones,