Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread mex
maybe you ask the person who creates the packages how nginx was build, which openssl-version applies etc pp. can you execute "openssl version" on the server nginx runs on? Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243341,243351#msg-243351 _

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread justin
I don't compile nginx, I get it from the official CentOS repo: [nginx] name=nginx repo baseurl=http://nginx.org/packages/centos/6/$basearch/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243341,243350#msg-243350 ___ ngi

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread mex
how did you compiled nginx, with openssl-sources via --with-openssl=/path/to/sources ? i could imagine that, if not, your (outdated) distros openssl-dev might be used. i have this issue when compiling nginx on debian; i have to download openssl and point nginx where to find the sources but since

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread mex
hmm, looks like some mismatch: in yoiur config you define ECDH, but in your screenshot i see DH configured (please compare your screenshot with the ssllabs-link i provided, esp. the cipher-suites/handshake - part. should be: TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0xc030) ECDH 256 bits (eq. 30

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread justin
Comparing the result from makepw.com and my site, I am missing the following cipher suites: TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0xc030) ECDH 256 bits (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0xc02f) ECDH 256 bits (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_A

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread justin
Sucks the forum software cutting of the cipher list string, here is what I am using in a gist: https://gist.github.com/nodesocket/8d4cc41c91466ae17b80 Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243341,243346#msg-243346 ___ nginx mailing

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread justin
I tried what was recommended by (http://www.mare-system.de/guide-to-nginx-ssl-spdy-hsts/#perfect-forward-secrecy): But still missing: IE 11 / Win 8.1 (FAIL) IE 8-10 / Win 7 (NO FS) IE 7 / Vista (NO FS) Here is my exact config: ssl_prefer_se

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread mex
btw, check the following for a reference for PFS-setup: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=makepw.com ssl-settings are: ssl_protocols SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2; ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; ssl_ciphers EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM:EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA384:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA256:EECD

Re: Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread mex
Hi justin, > even though I am using all the recommend settings. which recommended settings? recommended by whom? i learned that, from ssllabs-view, only the cipher-suites recommended by ivan ristic seem to work: http://www.mare-system.de/guide-to-nginx-ssl-spdy-hsts/#perfect-forward-secrecy all

Re: ssl on different servers

2013-10-01 Thread mex
what is your problem then? Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243340,243342#msg-243342 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Getting forward secrecy enabled

2013-10-01 Thread justin
On ssllabs.com I am getting the following, even though I am using all the recommend settings. http://i.imgur.com/TlsKMzP.png Here are my nginx settings: ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; ssl_protocols SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2; ssl_ciphers "EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM EECDH+ECDSA+SH

ssl on different servers

2013-10-01 Thread dossi
Hi, My domain.com is on ip: x.x.x.x where I have a configuration like: server { server_name sub.domain.com; location / { proxy_pass http://y.y.y.y; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded

Re: Solving a 500 error

2013-10-01 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On 1 October 2013 22:57, Ian Hobson wrote: > On 01/10/2013 20:36, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > To be fair, chap, you're the one who has access to the log files! What > do *they* say? > > They tell me nothing new. You get a 500 in your *access* log and a simultaneous entry in your *error* log does

Re: Solving a 500 error

2013-10-01 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 22:57 +0100, Ian Hobson wrote: > On 01/10/2013 20:36, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > > > To be fair, chap, you're the one who has access to the log files! What > > do *they* say? > They tell me nothing new. > > When I change a static file, I get a 500 error on the next static f

Re: Solving a 500 error

2013-10-01 Thread Ian Hobson
On 01/10/2013 20:36, Jonathan Matthews wrote: To be fair, chap, you're the one who has access to the log files! What do*they* say? They tell me nothing new. When I change a static file, I get a 500 error on the next static file I request - even if it is not the file I have changed. Sometime

Re: Solving a 500 error

2013-10-01 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On 1 October 2013 17:52, Ian Hobson wrote: > Hi All, > > I have an nginx install with the configuration below. > > The server is a linux VM running under Virtual Box on my windows machine. > The website / directory is made available as a sharename using Samba, which > I connect to from Windows, so

Re: nginx-1.5.6

2013-10-01 Thread Kevin Worthington
Hello Nginx users, Now available: Nginx 1.5.6 for Windows http://goo.gl/Bffumh (32-bit and 64-bit versions) These versions are to support legacy users who are already using Cygwin based builds of Nginx. Officially supported native Windows binaries are at nginx.org. Announcements are also availab

Solving a 500 error

2013-10-01 Thread Ian Hobson
Hi All, I have an nginx install with the configuration below. The server is a linux VM running under Virtual Box on my windows machine. The website / directory is made available as a sharename using Samba, which I connect to from Windows, so I can edit the files. I edit in windows, using fami

nginx and upstart

2013-10-01 Thread Ingo Schmidt
Hi! I have seen this question has been asked before in the list, but unfortunately there haven't been any answers, so let's see if I have more luck :) In can successfully upgrade the nginx binary on the fly as documented here: http://wiki.nginx.org/CommandLine#Upgrading_To_a_New_Binary_On_The

Re: root works, alias doesn't

2013-10-01 Thread Valentin V. Bartenev
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 11:12:41 Grant wrote: > >> It works if I specify the full path for the alias. What is the > >> difference between alias and root? I have root specified outside of > >> the server block and I thought I could use alias to avoid specifying > >> the full path again. > > >

nginx-1.5.6

2013-10-01 Thread Maxim Dounin
Changes with nginx 1.5.6 01 Oct 2013 *) Feature: the "fastcgi_buffering" directive. *) Feature: the "proxy_ssl_protocols" and "proxy_ssl_ciphers" directives. Thanks to Piotr Sikora. *) Feature: optimization of SSL handshakes when

Re: root works, alias doesn't

2013-10-01 Thread Valentin V. Bartenev
On Sunday 29 September 2013 23:20:35 B.R. wrote: [...] > ​For​ > > ​what you wish to do, you might try the following: > > set $rootDir /var/www/localhost/htdocs > root $rootDir/; > location / { > alias $rootDir/webalizer/; > } > > alias is meant for exceptional overload of root in a location

Re: Peer closed connection in SSL handshake when using chrome

2013-10-01 Thread nginxnewbie33
Seems I'm answering my own question but it leads to another. This is not really an issue with CHROME the problem is that I had fiddler running while I was trying to bring up my app. So it is actually fiddler that causes the errors. I also have issues with IE when I'm running fiddler jsut didn't

Peer closed connection in SSL handshake when using chrome

2013-10-01 Thread nginxnewbie33
I am receiving 'peer closed connection in SSL handshake (104: Connection reset by peer) while SSL handshaking, client: 168.166.124.xxx, server: 54.225.xx.xx' When I try to access an application through my nginx reverse proxy using CHROME. IE seems to work but Chrome recieves this error everytime.

[ANNOUNCE] ngx_shared_env_module

2013-10-01 Thread aschlosberg
I have decided to release an in-house module that I have been using for my hosting company. A full explanation of the goals of the module is available in the README. https://github.com/aschlosberg/ngx-shared-env I am well aware that this module introduces (minor) additional per-request overheads.

Re: root works, alias doesn't

2013-10-01 Thread Grant
>> It works if I specify the full path for the alias. What is the >> difference between alias and root? I have root specified outside of >> the server block and I thought I could use alias to avoid specifying >> the full path again. > > http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#alia