The question mark separates the locations with the arguments, thus the
location itself is merely '/'.
If you do not have a location set explicitely for '/', you probably have a
default location block ('location /') which will serve all unmatched
locations, thus resulting in 200.
Maybe the intent
I add an extra header, just for those who don't understand spdy...
add_header Alternate-Protocol "443:npn-spdy/3.1";
and specifically set up ssl protocols/ciphers and ocsp stapling but I'd
suggest that it's a limitation of the benchmark that you're hitting.
Using something like webpaget
My logs have been inundated with hits at example.com/?anything, though in
the actual logs 'anything' is a very long string of characters.
Log entry:
"GET /?anything HTTP/1.1" 200 581 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko"
(note there is no location for 'anythi
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:48 PM, W-Mark Kubacki wrote:
> Do not suppress header »Vary« or you will run into problems with
> proxies, which would otherwise always serve the file gzip-ped
> regardless of a requester indicating support or lack thereof.
>
Do not worry.
Reading Maxim's answer, the on
I need to evaluate if using spdy will be good for my website but i'm having
trouble setting everyting up. While using the chrome benchmark extension (1)
an error message stating that it was not possible to use spdy apeared. This
made me believe that there might be something wrong with my configurat
I modified the proxy_read_timeout and that has resolved the issue.
Hopefully that will suffice until I upgrade.
Thanks,
Iry
On 5/29/14 12:16 PM, "Reinis Rozitis" wrote:
>> 2014/05/28 16:11:52 [error] 16146#0: *1604 upstream timed out (110:
>Connection timed out) while reading response header fr
2014/05/28 16:11:52 [error] 16146#0: *1604 upstream timed out (110:
Connection timed out) while reading response header from upstream, client:
10.20.23.189, server: localhost, request: "GET
/library_common/browse_library?sort=name&operation=browse&f-description=All
&f-name=All&f-deleted=False&cnt
Someone, perhaps you, changed something on your backend (your "galaxy"
server, which means absolutely nothing to anyone on this list, do be
aware), and they fucked it. Or "introduced an intermittent performance
issue which is resulting in a proportion of your proxied requests to
time out", if you p
I have checked the error.log and the following is what I am seeing:
2014/05/28 15:18:39 [info] 16146#0: *987 client closed prematurely
connection, so upstream connection is closed too while sending request to
upstream, client: 10.40.42.12, server: localhost, request: "GET
/library_common/browse_li
2014-05-28 23:20 GMT+02:00 chili_confits :
> I have enabled gzip with
> ...
> gzip on;
> gzip_http_version 1.0;
> gzip_vary on;
> ...
> to satisfy incoming HTTP 1.0 requests.
>
> In a very similiar setup which got OWASP-evaluated, I read this - marked as
> a defect:
> "The web server sent
Hello!
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:20:38PM +, Iry Witham wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am writing to gather some insight on how I may need to change
> my configuration on Nginx. I have been running a galaxy server
> for 3+ years now and have begun experiencing issues with
> accessing several of
"The page you are looking for is temporarily unavailable. Please try
again later."
Can you provide me with insight?
The first thing would be to check what the actual HTTP error is (is it some
5xx or 4xx etc) - some browsers (like IE also Chrome) tend to display a
"userfriendly" page without
Hi Team,
I am writing to gather some insight on how I may need to change my
configuration on Nginx. I have been running a galaxy server for 3+ years now
and have begun experiencing issues with accessing several of the largest
libraries and get the following error: "The page you are looking for
Hello!
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 05:20:54PM -0400, chili_confits wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have enabled gzip with
> ...
> gzip on;
> gzip_http_version 1.0;
> gzip_vary on;
> ...
> to satisfy incoming HTTP 1.0 requests.
>
> In a very similiar setup which got OWASP-evaluated, I read this
Hello!
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:04:46PM +0800, Andy wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm trying to find a way to use OpenStack SWIFT with nginx, the below are
> request steps:
>
> 1. nginx is configured as proxy cache
> 2. client send a request to nginx for url: http://domain.com/filename.txt
> 3. ng
Hello guys,
I'm trying to find a way to use OpenStack SWIFT with nginx, the below are
request steps:
1. nginx is configured as proxy cache
2. client send a request to nginx for url: http://domain.com/filename.txt
3. nginx received the request and it is a cache miss, it need to fetch the
content f
16 matches
Mail list logo
