Hello -,
I have the similar problem.. !!
I installed testlink and running using nginx.
Sometimes.. Testlink hangs .. and I need to restart NGINX to get going.
6380#6120: *524 WSARecv() failed (10054: An existing connection was forcibly
closed by the remote host) while reading response header
Hi thanks for that
your suggestion:
-
So you say that /shop/index.php doesn't land to /shop/ location? Then
ensure that you don't have location /shop/index.php , otherwise see
debug log
---
I do want access to /shop/ as well as /shop/index.php - but only to a
Hello Nginx,
I have these lines:
location / {
proxy_pass http://172.4.1.2:8080;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $our_x_forwarded_for;
satisfy any;
allow 116.2.200.1;
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 04:09:30PM +0500, shahzaib shahzaib wrote:
Hi there,
Webserver is nginx and hotlinking is already enabled but the issue with no
Referer_Header for the requests being generated by this android
application.
What precautions should we take to prevent this application
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 04:11:04PM +0300, Marat Dakota wrote:
But I might copy-paste the code from ngx_http_headers_filter() to my header
filter, right? Or something will blow up eventually?
Yes (with appropriate changes). Nothing will blow up if done
properly.
--
Maxim Dounin
Здравствуйте, прошу подсказать как можно ограничить скорость скачивания
нужно чтобы все, кто попал в locaion /ABC
занимали в общей полосе отдачи с сервера не более, например, 1 мегабайта,
вне зависимости от количества клиентов данного url ?
как понял limit_rate работает per user
а нужно в
Guys, someone cloned our videosharing website and created a FAKE android
application using same name as our website and people considering it as our
app, which is not. The main problem we're facing is, the videos being
served from this android application are hotlinked to our server due to
which
But if I have:
/location1 {
...
}
/location2 {
add_header XXX-Some-Header Ololo;
...
}
And I do a subrequest from /location1 handler to /location2?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Maxim Dounin mdou...@mdounin.ru wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:14:15PM +0300, Marat
And one more question. I've noticed that I'll have to
copy-paste ngx_http_header_val_s definition too (because it is defined in
.c file) and this is a risk to have different structures when something is
changed in nginx and my module still have the previous version.
Another idea is to mock r-main
if ($http_user_agent ~* Linux;Android 4.2.2) {
return 403;
}
Looks correct, but maybe nginx does not like the ; in the provided
string? To be true, I never used such an rule. But anyhow this isn't the
perfect solution: You're just blocking Android with version 4.2.2 with
that. When an
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:32:30PM +0300, Marat Dakota wrote:
I also might have:
/location3 {
proxy_pass https://www.blabla;
}
In this case my subrequest has the response headers from www.blabla. This
means that the statement that there are no headers in subrequest responses
Hi,
I was digging the reason why add_header in nginx config doesn't work for a
subrequest and I've found this in ngx_http_headers_filter_module.c:
if ((conf-expires == NGX_HTTP_EXPIRES_OFF conf-headers == NULL)
|| r != r-main)
{
return ngx_http_next_header_filter(r);
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:48:45PM +0300, Marat Dakota wrote:
Well, my problem is that I need these headers (I eat them from my module's
header filter).
I use subrequests for API calls. Does this mean that subrequests are the
wrong way to do so? Do I need to use upstreams instead?
I also might have:
/location3 {
proxy_pass https://www.blabla;
}
In this case my subrequest has the response headers from www.blabla. This
means that the statement that there are no headers in subrequest responses
is not completely correct.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Marat Dakota
16.03.15 8:11, jacograaff пишет:
I am moving from a development server to a live server and would like to
still test before REALLY going live.
I need to redirect access to a sub-folder until I am satisfied with the
stability
this is what i have:
On 16.03.2015 13:09, shahzaib shahzaib wrote:
Guys, someone cloned our videosharing website and created a FAKE android
application using same name as our website and people considering it as
our app, which is not. The main problem we're facing is, the videos
being served from this android
Well, my problem is that I need these headers (I eat them from my module's
header filter).
I use subrequests for API calls. Does this mean that subrequests are the
wrong way to do so? Do I need to use upstreams instead?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Maxim Dounin mdou...@mdounin.ru wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 06:45:30PM +0500, shahzaib shahzaib wrote:
Hi there,
I have installed that android app and requested log against my ip is
following :
39.49.52.224 - - [15/Mar/2015:10:40:26 +0500] GET
/files/thumbs/2015/03/14/1426310448973c5-1.jpg HTTP/1.1 200 13096 -
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Marat Dakota wrote:
In a few modules I've found a trick:
if (r != r-connection-data)
r-connection-data = r;
Careful. This is a common hack to cheat nginx's
ngx_http_postpone_filter_module when the in-stock subrequest model
cannot serve us well.
I don't think that something other than manual address-hostname pairs
maintainance can help you
map $upstream_addr $upstream_hostname {
10.0.0.1:80 hostname1;
10.0.0.2:80 hostname2;
}
...
proxy_set_header Host $upstream_hostname;
15.03.15 17:19, sapientcloud пишет:
Already tried
20 matches
Mail list logo
