Re: Nginx 1.9 from package & RTMP

2015-05-12 Thread Roman Arutyunyan
On 13 May 2015, at 05:17, Fabbbio wrote: > I just install nginx 1.9 on my ubuntu 15.04 machine using precompiled > package "apt-get install", nginx in working and now how can I add RTMP > module? You cannot add a module to a compiled nginx. To add a module you should recompile it from source w

Nginx 1.9 from package & RTMP

2015-05-12 Thread Fabbbio
I just install nginx 1.9 on my ubuntu 15.04 machine using precompiled package "apt-get install", nginx in working and now how can I add RTMP module? Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,258836,258836#msg-258836 ___ nginx mailing lis

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:33:11PM -0400, jwroblewski wrote: > Valentin V. Bartenev Wrote: > --- > > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 09:25:05 jwroblewski wrote: > > > My use case is that upstreams are supposed to return within ~100ms, > > > theref

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread Valentin V. Bartenev
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 12:33:11 jwroblewski wrote: > Valentin V. Bartenev Wrote: > --- > > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 09:25:05 jwroblewski wrote: > > > My use case is that upstreams are supposed to return within ~100ms, > > > therefore using burst is

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread jwroblewski
Valentin V. Bartenev Wrote: --- > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 09:25:05 jwroblewski wrote: > > My use case is that upstreams are supposed to return within ~100ms, > > therefore using burst is not an option. I wanted to use limit_req to > filter > > out

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread Valentin V. Bartenev
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 16:46:29 B.R. wrote: > I do not necessarily have a say on what is discussed here, but: > >1. I believe putting known limitations in the docs makes sense. Who >defined the docs as sticking to the most common use cases? Technical docs >are technical docs. I'm agre

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread B.R.
I do not necessarily have a say on what is discussed here, but: 1. I believe putting known limitations in the docs makes sense. Who defined the docs as sticking to the most common use cases? Technical docs are technical docs. 2. Using burst answers a specific need which has not been ex

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread Valentin V. Bartenev
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 09:25:05 jwroblewski wrote: > My use case is that upstreams are supposed to return within ~100ms, > therefore using burst is not an option. I wanted to use limit_req to filter > out traffic which is exceeds my backend's processing capacity, but > apparently it is not the righ

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread jwroblewski
My use case is that upstreams are supposed to return within ~100ms, therefore using burst is not an option. I wanted to use limit_req to filter out traffic which is exceeds my backend's processing capacity, but apparently it is not the right tool to use, if it only operates with millisecond-precisi

Re: Possible limitation of ngx_http_limit_req_module

2015-05-12 Thread Valentin V. Bartenev
On Monday 11 May 2015 10:59:46 jwroblewski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm observing an inconsistent behavior of ngx_http_limit_req_module in nginx > 1.7.12. The relevant excerpts from my config: > > http { > ... > # A fixed string used as a key, to make all requests fall into the same > zone > limi

Re: Official packages v1.8.0 do NOT include the GeoIP module

2015-05-12 Thread B.R.
Thanks Sergey, I naively though every module being documented on the official website were included. There was/is no clear documentation about what is (not) included in the official binary, helping people to decide whether it is feasible to switch from custom builds to official ones. Would it be

Re: Official packages v1.8.0 do NOT include the GeoIP module

2015-05-12 Thread Sergey Budnevitch
> On 11 May 2015, at 15:15, B.R. wrote: > > Hello, > > We are facing quite some trouble with the official nginx packages: > their nginx -V does not show any sign of the GeoIP module. Package never has geoip module, because it requires extra library (libgeoip). Current policy is to include all

24: Too many Open connections

2015-05-12 Thread ranjuj
Hello, We have 3 nginx web servers behind an nginx proxy and we were seeing "24: Too many Open connections" error in nginx log of one server and found that some of the users are getting 504 timed out error. We have observer that the problem was only in one of the web-server. We restarted php_cgi &

Re: Wildcard SSL and Wildcard hostnames

2015-05-12 Thread ron ramos
hi if you are using amazon you can try their DNS service Route53. you can point the root domain to an ELB via ALIAS setting. regards, ron On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:23 PM, braindeaf wrote: > The SSL Checking service did indeed point out the error. I will admit to my > own stupidity on this on

Re: Official packages v1.8.0 do NOT include the GeoIP module

2015-05-12 Thread B.R.
Has anyone else observed the same? Is there any reason to that? --- *B. R.* On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:15 PM, B.R. wrote: > Hello, > > We are facing quite some trouble with the official nginx packages: > their nginx -V does not show any sign of the GeoIP module. > > Confirmed for: > - Debian pack