Re: how to install nginx_substitutions_filter in existing Nginx

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 09:59:43PM -0400, David Woodstuck wrote: Hi there, > I have a host Nginx server running in port: 9000, This Nginx will proxy > http://www.myserver.com:10085/. Some pages from > http://www.myserver.com:10085/ have a lot of iframes whose srcs are >

Re: FastCGI KeepAlive

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 03:48:22PM -0400, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi there, > > proxy_pass http://backend; > > Is this an error in the docs? I think the http:// here isn't right. proxy_pass can speak http or https. The config above is the way you tell it which one to speak to this

Re: how nginx decide which server block to use

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 03:26:10PM +0800, George / wrote: Hi there, For the question in the Subject: line, see http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/request_processing.html#mixed_name_ip_based_servers > i am running nginx version: nginx/1.12.0.i got following server block > config as below, all

session ticket key rotation

Hello, https://nginx.org/r/ssl_session_ticket_key mention session ticket key rotation. Which process read these files? master or worker? Must it be readable for root only or nginx-user? Must I signal nginx processes the rotation? If yes, how? via SIGHUP? thanks for clarification, Andreas

Re: add_header

That'll be it then. I'd added cache control headers. Thanks for the swift reply. Mass edit coming up! Steve On 22/06/17 08:34, Reinis Rozitis wrote: The solution was to also add that header to the location{} block that I use to manage the relevant static resources. This seems rather

Re: add_header

The solution was to also add that header to the location{} block that I use to manage the relevant static resources. This seems rather strange. Is it supposed to work this way? If your location blocks contain any add_header directives then those comming from server {} block are ignored (and

add_header

Hi folks, As a precaution against CORS, I add_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin *; outside any location{} block in my server{} definition. I have recently had a problem where I deliver .css via a CDN, and that CDN references font files also on the CDN, and this was triggering CORS, so

Re: FastCGI KeepAlive

> proxy_pass http://backend; Is this an error in the docs? I think the http:// here isn't right. http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_upstream_module.html Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,275028,275038#msg-275038 ___ nginx

Re: block google app

I'm sending 403 responses now, so I screwed up by mistaking the fields in the logs. I'm going back to lurking mode again with my tail shamefully between my legs. This code in the image location section will block the google app: if ($http_user_agent ~*

Re: Stale While Revalidate Expires

Hi Maxim, Thank so much for your response. You are correct, and the configuration of proxy_cache_use_stale updating was present. Stale while revalidate is a great option, and we use in a websites with more than 50 millions users/month. This graph is our time to waiting to delivery pages

Re: [patch] Http image_filter: return 405 when method isHEADandbodyis empty.

So, the user will never know what happened on the backend (just get 415). Get it, thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "Maxim Dounin";; Send time: Thursday, Jun 22, 2017 1:24 AM To: "nginx-devel"; Subject: Re:

Re: [patch] Slice filter: support for empty file.

Hi, On Tuesday, Jun 20, 2017 11:01 PM +0300, Maxim Dounin wrote: >On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:39:44AM +0800, 胡聪 (hucc) wrote: > >> >416 will be returned when the request has no Range HEADER and the target >> >file is >> >empty. Apparently, it does not conform to the HTTP protocol. Empty file

Re: [patch] Http image_filter: return 405 when method is HEADandbodyis empty.

Hello! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:05:37AM +0800, 胡聪 (hucc) wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday, Jun 21, 2017 1:38 AM +0300, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > >When the response is read from a static file, not proxied, and/or > >proxied with "proxy_method GET;", an empty response means exacly > >that: an empty

Re: [patch] Http image_filter: return 405 when method is HEADandbodyis empty.

Hi, On Wednesday, Jun 21, 2017 1:38 AM +0300, Maxim Dounin wrote: >When the response is read from a static file, not proxied, and/or >proxied with "proxy_method GET;", an empty response means exacly >that: an empty response, and returning 415 is perfectly correct. > >The ngx_buf_size() test will

Re: FastCGI KeepAlive

Hello! On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:09:17PM -0400, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > What does it take to enable KeepAlive for FastCGI upstream servers? > I've set upstream { keepalive 99; } and location { fastcgi_keep_conn on; ] > but nginx is still closing the connection after each request. With

Re: Peer closed connection in SSL handshake marking upstream as failed

Hello! On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:51:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > We're seeing an 502 bad gateway responses to client on an nginx load > balanced upstream due to "no live upstreams". > > The upstream in question has 2 servers defined with default settings > running over https

FastCGI KeepAlive

What does it take to enable KeepAlive for FastCGI upstream servers? I've set upstream { keepalive 99; } and location { fastcgi_keep_conn on; ] but nginx is still closing the connection after each request. Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,275028,275028#msg-275028

Peer closed connection in SSL handshake marking upstream as failed

We're seeing an 502 bad gateway responses to client on an nginx load balanced upstream due to "no live upstreams". The upstream in question has 2 servers defined with default settings running over https (proxy_pass https://myupstream). When this happens we see "no live upstreams while

Re: Is proxy_cache_purge directive not available in NGINX free version ?

Thank you Jim Best Regards Rebaca Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,275020,275026#msg-275026 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: Is proxy_cache_purge directive not available in NGINX free version ?

Thanks a lot for a very quick response Regards, Rebaca Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,275020,275025#msg-275025 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

When will primary server come back in http upstream module?

Hi, Refer to http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_upstream_module.html#server , if all primary server are unavailable, backup server will handle request. I have two question? 1. What's the meaning of unavailable? 2. When will primary server come back, after fail_timeout? Thanks, Linbo

Re: Is proxy_cache_purge directive not available in NGINX free version ?

Hello, On 06/21/2017 09:31 AM, rebaca wrote: Hi I am trying to experiment with purging cache content in Nginx server. The Nginx I have is a free version (Not Nginx Plus version). As per one of the document from Nginx website, in order to enable purging on Nginx, I need to use the directive -

Re: Is proxy_cache_purge directive not available in NGINX free version ?

Hi, On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:31:03AM -0400, rebaca wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to experiment with purging cache content in Nginx server. The > Nginx I have is a free version (Not Nginx Plus version). > > As per one of the document from Nginx website, in order to enable purging on > Nginx, I

Re: Растет кол-во inode из-за кеша

В логи заглядывал еще до создания данной темы. лог настроен следующим образом > error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log notice; При этом до недавнего времени в логе проскакивали только сообщения > [alert] 5092#5092: send() failed (90: Message too long) А теперь еще появились > [crit] 5093#5093:

Is proxy_cache_purge directive not available in NGINX free version ?

Hi I am trying to experiment with purging cache content in Nginx server. The Nginx I have is a free version (Not Nginx Plus version). As per one of the document from Nginx website, in order to enable purging on Nginx, I need to use the directive - proxy_cache_purge. But when I try to add this

Re: Enabling NGINX to forward static file request to origin server if the file is absent

Hi Reinis, Thanks a lot for quick and insightful response. From, Rebaca Posted at Nginx Forum: https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,275008,275019#msg-275019 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

NGINX как клиент для Google Cloud Pub/Sub

Добрый день, товарищи. Не сведущ в теме, потому вопрос может звучать глупо. Не сталкивался ли кто-то с примерами использования NGINX в виде клиента для Google Cloud Pub/Sub? Как lua-resty-redis для pub/sub в Redis, к примеру. Любая помощь приветствуется. Заранее спасибо. -- Sincerely, Dmitry

Re: Enabling NGINX to forward static file request to origin server if the file is absent

Currently NGINX supports static file caching wherein if the file is present in the location (derived from the config), then it will serve the client directly. Else it just intimates the client that the file is not present. There is no capability to forward the request to origin server, get the

Re: Растет кол-во inode из-за кеша

> > Вам же порекомендовали не использовать proxy_temp_path на другом разделе Так так и сделал, почитал доку и приписал параметр use_temp_path=off к своему конфигу. Вот цитата из доки. > Поэтому лучше, если кэш будет находиться на той же файловой системе, что и > каталог с временными файлами.

Re: Растет кол-во inode из-за кеша

21 июня 2017 г., 11:09 пользователь Иван Мишин написал: > Максим, кеш дира /tmp/ram/ была забита на 100% 28Гб из 28Гб. Сбросил > часть кеша, получилось 25Гб занято из 28Гб. Затем исправил то о чем ты > говорил и начальный конфиг (приведенный в первом письме) стал

Re: Растет кол-во inode из-за кеша

Максим, кеш дира /tmp/ram/ была забита на 100% 28Гб из 28Гб. Сбросил часть кеша, получилось 25Гб занято из 28Гб. Затем исправил то о чем ты говорил и начальный конфиг (приведенный в первом письме) стал выглядеть вот так: > proxy_cache_path /tmp/ram/ levels=1:2 use_temp_path=off >

how nginx decide which server block to use

Hi all, i am running nginx version: nginx/1.12.0.i got following server block config as below, all request match regular expression work well,but request to server s01.example.com return 404.what's wrong? i googled for a while,most of the article said,it first try to match literal string

Re: block google app

Actually I think I was mistaken and the field is the user agent. I will change the variable and see what happens. I did some experiments to show the pattern match works. On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:56:46 -0700 li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > I want to block by referrer. I provided a more "normal"

Enabling NGINX to forward static file request to origin server if the file is absent

BACKGROUND: --- Currently NGINX supports static file caching wherein if the file is present in the location (derived from the config), then it will serve the client directly. Else it just intimates the client that the file is not present. There is no capability to forward the