On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> (Sorry again for late reply. See below for comments.)
>
>
Thank you for the reply.
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:16:53PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
>
> > Here is another round of SO_REUSEPORT support. The plot is changed a
>
details: http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/659464c695b7
branches:
changeset: 5357:659464c695b7
user: Valentin Bartenev
date: Mon Sep 02 20:06:03 2013 +0400
description:
Disable symlinks: removed recursive call of ngx_file_o_path_info().
It is surplus.
diffstat:
src/core/ngx_open_file
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:24:33AM -0300, Wandenberg Peixoto wrote:
> did you have opportunity to take a look on this patch?
Not yet, sorry. It's in my TODO and I'll try to look at it this
week. Overall it seems good enough, but it certainly needs
style/cosmetic cleanup before it can
Hello!
(Sorry again for late reply. See below for comments.)
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:16:53PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> Here is another round of SO_REUSEPORT support. The plot is changed a
> little bit to allow smooth configure reloading and binary upgrading.
> Here is what happens wh
Hi Maxim,
did you have opportunity to take a look on this patch?
Regards,
Wandenberg
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Wandenberg Peixoto
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Thanks for your help. I hope that the patch be OK now.
> I don't know if the function and variable names are on nginx pattern.
> Feel fr
Hello!
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 11:19:06AM +0300, Aviram Cohen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> [...]
> >
> > if (conf->upstream.ssl
> > && ngx_ssl_trusted_certificate(cf, conf->upstream.ssl,
> >
