[nginx] Upstream: cache revalidation with conditional requests.

details: http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/43ccaf8e8728 branches: changeset: 5441:43ccaf8e8728 user: Maxim Dounin date: Mon Nov 18 20:48:22 2013 +0400 description: Upstream: cache revalidation with conditional requests. The following new directives are introduced: proxy_cache_revalidate

Re: [PATCH] ssl support for uwsgi upstream

> Hello! > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > >> >> > Hello! >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 08:50:14AM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, attached you will find a patch adding two new options to the >> >> uwsgi >> >> upstream module: >> >> >> >>

Is it possible a config option for the TLS record size?

Hi all! Right now we have compiled our own nginx instance to change the TLS record size [1], which is fine, but I am wondering if it would be very complicated to change this for a config option. I am new to the internals of nginx, and before trying to make a patch it would be nice to have some opi

Re: [PATCH] ssl support for uwsgi upstream

Hello! On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 08:50:14AM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > > > >> Hi all, attached you will find a patch adding two new options to the > >> uwsgi > >> upstream module: > >> > >> uwsgi_ssl (def

Re: pls. help for adding another parameter to ngx_upstream_server

Hello! On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 06:31:42PM +0900, moto kawasaki wrote: [...] > mdounin> > Now, I am struggling to add "setfib=N" parameter to "server" token > in > mdounin> > "upstream" clause, and so far failed. > mdounin> > mdounin> Could you please point out use cases for such a parameter?

Re: [PATCH] ssl support for uwsgi upstream

> Hello! > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 08:50:14AM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > >> Hi all, attached you will find a patch adding two new options to the >> uwsgi >> upstream module: >> >> uwsgi_ssl (default off) >> >> uwsgi_ssl_session_reuse >> >> uwsgi over ssl has been officially added today t

Re: [PATCH] ssl support for uwsgi upstream

Hello! On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 08:50:14AM +0100, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > Hi all, attached you will find a patch adding two new options to the uwsgi > upstream module: > > uwsgi_ssl (default off) > > uwsgi_ssl_session_reuse > > uwsgi over ssl has been officially added today to the uWSGI pro

Re: IPv6 & IPv4 backend with proxy_bind

Hello! On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:24:43PM +1030, SplitIce wrote: > Hi, > > We use proxy_bind to ensure traffic always goes out via the same address as > the incoming request i.e the bound address where a server has many > addresses. This is a hard restriction in our use case. > > We are looking

unsuscribe

___ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel

Re: IPv6 & IPv4 backend with proxy_bind

Hi, We use proxy_bind to ensure traffic always goes out via the same address as the incoming request i.e the bound address where a server has many addresses. This is a hard restriction in our use case. We are looking to add support for IPv6 backends, we would like to allocate a single IPv6 outgoi

Re: IPv6 & IPv4 backend with proxy_bind

Hello! On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:04:20PM +1030, SplitIce wrote: > Looking at the documentation it seems there is no way to specify a proxy > bind address for both IPv4 and IPv6. > > You can specify one or the other, but never both. This is a particular > issue when a configuration is setup to a