Re: pls. help for adding another parameter to ngx_upstream_server

2013-11-28 Thread moto kawasaki
Dear Mr. Dounin and list members, Thank you very much for your suggestion, I finally made it work !! Now we can write something like; http { proxy_setfib N; } or http { server{ proxy_setfib N; } } and the connections toward upstream server a

Re: redis nginx 1.5.x support

2013-11-28 Thread W-Mark Kubacki
Here are the two aforementioned changes: https://github.com/wmark/ossdl-overlay/blob/61d928a0df58e5d38385920ce05e7381f86913c7/www-servers/nginx/files/http_redis-0.3.6-trailer.patch -- Mark 2013/11/28 SplitIce : > Yes that seems much better than taking over the > u->headers_in.content_length_n f

Re: redis nginx 1.5.x support

2013-11-28 Thread SplitIce
Yes that seems much better than taking over the u->headers_in.content_length_n field. Didn't realize just how similar memcache was :) Thanks. On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Hello! > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:39:32PM +1030, SplitIce wrote: > > > I am aware atleast 2

Re: redis nginx 1.5.x support

2013-11-28 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:39:32PM +1030, SplitIce wrote: > I am aware atleast 2 others are considering developing patches with one the > module maintainer. > > I wanted to improve so have attempted this upgrade myself. Its only a small > patch, from my understanding its the upstream leng

redis nginx 1.5.x support

2013-11-28 Thread SplitIce
I am aware atleast 2 others are considering developing patches with one the module maintainer. I wanted to improve so have attempted this upgrade myself. Its only a small patch, from my understanding its the upstream length field that has changed between 1.4.x and 1.5.x. I would like to know if I