On 2013-12-20 13:19, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> description:
> SSL: ssl_buffer_size directive.
Great to see this going into mainline.
On 2013-12-20 19:58, Ilya Grigorik wrote:
> (a) Is there any way to force a packet flush on record end?
That would be indeed nice. Flushing would prevent a TLS reco
Awesome, really glad to see this! A couple of followup questions...
(a) Is there any way to force a packet flush on record end? At the moment
nginx will fragment multiple records across packet boundaries, which is
suboptimal as it means that I need a minimum of two packets to decode any
record - e
Hello!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:05:16PM -0200, Wandenberg Peixoto wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> sorry for the long delay. I hope you remember my issue.
> In attach is the new patch with the changes you suggest.
> Can you check it again? I hope it can be applied to nginx code now.
>
> About this poin
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 07:26:26PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:09:44AM +0300, Raman Shishniou wrote:
> > Is something wrong with this patch?
>
> Previous statement that it looks overcomplicated still applies.
>
> [...]
We've started internal testing of the attached pa
details: http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/a297b7ad6f94
branches:
changeset: 5487:a297b7ad6f94
user: Maxim Dounin
date: Fri Dec 20 16:18:25 2013 +0400
description:
SSL: ssl_buffer_size directive.
diffstat:
src/event/ngx_event_openssl.c | 9 ++---
src/event/ngx_event_ope
