Hello!
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:44:42PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote:
> I wanted to follow up on this because our software has been
> released and so I can provide a few more details about our
> setup.
Thank you for the details.
[...]
> I read through the Cloudflare blog entry (thank you --
hanks for your consideration,
Nate
-Original Message-
From: nginx-devel [mailto:nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.org] On Behalf Of Maxim
Dounin
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:25 PM
To: nginx-devel@nginx.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proxy: support configuration of socket buffer sizes
Hello!
On Mon
Hello!
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:02:04PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote:
> Maxim,
>
> I'd be happy to explain. Our application is actually relying
> more on the change to support to SO_SNDBUF option, but I noticed
> the SO_RCVBUF option there and thought it was worth exposing
> that at the same
nx-devel [mailto:nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.org] On Behalf Of Maxim
Dounin
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 1:21 PM
To: nginx-devel@nginx.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proxy: support configuration of socket buffer sizes
Hello!
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:22:41PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote:
> I just wan
Hello!
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:22:41PM +, Karstens, Nate wrote:
> I just wanted to follow up on this patch and make sure that the
> fraud detection notice or confidentiality notice added by my
> company wasn't precluding it from consideration.
No, it wasn't. And the fraud detection not
Greetings,
I just wanted to follow up on this patch and make sure that the fraud detection
notice or confidentiality notice added by my company wasn't precluding it from
consideration.
Thanks!
Nate
-Original Message-
From: nginx-devel [mailto:nginx-devel-boun...@nginx.org] On Behalf O
