Here are the two aforementioned changes:
https://github.com/wmark/ossdl-overlay/blob/61d928a0df58e5d38385920ce05e7381f86913c7/www-servers/nginx/files/http_redis-0.3.6-trailer.patch
--
Mark
2013/11/28 SplitIce :
> Yes that seems much better than taking over the
> u->headers_in.content_length_n f
Yes that seems much better than taking over the u->headers_in.content_length_n
field.
Didn't realize just how similar memcache was :)
Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:39:32PM +1030, SplitIce wrote:
>
> > I am aware atleast 2
Hello!
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:39:32PM +1030, SplitIce wrote:
> I am aware atleast 2 others are considering developing patches with one the
> module maintainer.
>
> I wanted to improve so have attempted this upgrade myself. Its only a small
> patch, from my understanding its the upstream leng
I am aware atleast 2 others are considering developing patches with one the
module maintainer.
I wanted to improve so have attempted this upgrade myself. Its only a small
patch, from my understanding its the upstream length field that has changed
between 1.4.x and 1.5.x.
I would like to know if I
