I dont like how this Hanselmann states his personal opinion as fact
without really explaining the backgrounds. He absolutely lost my
respect when simply calling ThreadStatic evil, but stating
Thread.AllocateNamedDataSlot as good solution, while this is
eventually the same thing. Its even written in
No problem Simon... my advise was only to prevent some request, as I saw in
the past, in our JIRA.
What is important is recognize where the real problem is and avoid
workaround through NH.
2010/3/2 Simon Laroche
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I'm sorry if what I wrote sounded like I was requesting a feature fo
Hi Fabio,
I'm sorry if what I wrote sounded like I was requesting a feature for what
is obviously a problem with the database design.
Yes not-found="ignore" will be fine since for this app's performance is not
really critical. And yes, as soon as possible, we will change the db.
Thanks,
Simon
what I mean is that not-found="ignore" is the workaround/patch of what you
need.
The real solution is clean the DB design.
Please avoid a request about a workaround of a workaround when the real
matter is a really bad DB design.
2010/3/2 Fabio Maulo
> NH has the way to work with it... can you ac
Thanks for the help.
I just wanted to write a quick update to tell that it works perfectly
with the newest version of nhibernate.
On 1 Mar., 16:55, Diego Mijelshon wrote:
> You can get the binaries
> athttp://hornget.net/packages/orm/nhibernate/nhibernate-trunk, or checkout the
> sources
> fro
NH has the way to work with it... can you accept that it will be
not efficient ?
If so the way is: not-found="ignore"
not-found="ignore" mean no FK and ignore invalid values (exactly what you
have).
not-found="ignore" is inefficient.
NH should that... NH should this... yes is true but.. can you g
I agree but the unsafe data is used by the other data access code which I
cannot change (legacy library). I thought NH would be flexible enough for me
to continue working using the same data until all the legacy code was
replaced.
Do you think a custom user type would allow me to work with the zér
Are you talking about a null object ?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, John Davidson wrote:
> How about a different null value in your database and code where you
> replace 0 with -1? Then NHibernate should be able to work while you fix the
> DB design.
>
> John Davidson
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010
Some more cache related problems. I am having a problem getting the
results of associated or child entities to be loaded into the
nhibernate cache along with the root entity when using the Expand()
method. The root entity loads fine though. So the following:
var query = session.Linq();
How about a different null value in your database and code where you replace
0 with -1? Then NHibernate should be able to work while you fix the DB
design.
John Davidson
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Simon Laroche wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> No FK but the database can be changed and will be changed
Well... the first step should be : remove unsafe data.
In this specific case it mean: replace 0 (zero) with null.
2010/3/2 Simon Laroche
> Hi Fabio,
>
> No FK but the database can be changed and will be changed but I plan to do
> it piece by piece. So, I either make sure that we remove all the o
Hi Fabio,
No FK but the database can be changed and will be changed but I plan to do
it piece by piece. So, I either make sure that we remove all the old data
access code, alter the db and then switch to NH or I find a way to change
NH's default behavior for the time being and then update and add
Thanks for the reply, have to check how to fix this, i use native too
and mysql.
On 25 Feb, 21:17, Rab wrote:
> When I first used NHibernate, I discovered a bug in the Native
> handler.
>
> I had two classes, Organisations, and Capabilities. These were many to
> many mapped. I was using MySql, an
More relevant links.
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/StoringThingsOnThreads.aspx
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ATaleOfTwoTechniquesTheThreadStaticAttributeAndSystemWebHttpContextCurrentItems.aspx
http://integralpath.blogs.com/thinkingoutloud/2005/03/threadstatic_fu.html
Socratees.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2
@Fabio: I'd like to be, but you're making it difficult.
You say I'm "lazy" and "don't have time to explain my problem", but
that's the complete opposite of the truth. Perhaps you were too "lazy"
to visit StackOverflow and read the problem? I can understand why you
might be frustrated when people d
be happy!!
2010/3/2 Kent Boogaart
> Wow, haven't heard that one before. I've heard of cross-posting
> though, which is also considered a strong discourtesy. Rock and a hard
> place.
>
> Besides, I figured I was doing everyone a favor since the formatting
> on StackOverflow is much easier to read
Wow, haven't heard that one before. I've heard of cross-posting
though, which is also considered a strong discourtesy. Rock and a hard
place.
Besides, I figured I was doing everyone a favor since the formatting
on StackOverflow is much easier to read than in here. And I think
"lazy" is a stretch g
@Zorgoban,
I found this thread on Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Framework.ASP.net rather
enlightening.
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet/browse_frm/thread/cef5d88a2e3e26e1/85798178bdf7c0c8?q=asp.net+thread+agile&rnum=1&pli=1
Not sure if its of help to you though.
a lazy support request is when a guy is too lazy to copy&paste the text of
request and instead y send a link.
You can be "lazy" for an answer because the answer is a courtesy but you
can't be lazy in a request.
Repeating my self:
if you don't have time to explain your problem you can imagine how mu
so you don't have an FK there right ?
and the "legacy" DB is untouchable because it was designed very well by an
high-level expert, right ?
2010/3/2 Simon Laroche
> Hi,
>
> We have a lagacy database where a null value in a many-to-one relation is
> represented by à 0. What is the best to hav
That link from MSDN only shows major events. It is a heavily truncated
subset and should not be used for architecture planning at the level you are
working at. I have seen more complete lists (there are 2, but both are still
just subsets and do not equal the complete ASP.NET pipeline).
Take Piers
@Robert Rudduck: What a great article! This discourages the use of the
Session as a member variable and trusting to be clean inside one
request. But if you allways use the session inside a using()
statement, you should be save. There might even be the possibility
with the member variable if you ini
If I look at the lifecycles of either an ASP.Net Page or MVC Request,
I really doubt any of those are spwaning multiple threads for one GET
or POST. In the case of ASP.Net its not mentioned in the MSDN
documentation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178472.aspx.
In case of MVC I couldnt qu
Hi,
We have a lagacy database where a null value in a many-to-one relation is
represented by à 0. What is the best to have NH replicate this behavior?
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhus..
This link has a good explanation as well as experimental evidence:
http://piers7.blogspot.com/2005/11/threadstatic-callcontext-and_02.html
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Angel Java Lopez wrote:
> Source link?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Fabio Maulo wrote:
>
>> because MS said that y
Yes, there was a problem
2010/3/2 Simon Laroche
> It's back now but it is super slow,
>
> Simon
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Angel Java Lopez wrote:
>
>> It's working for me (from Argentina)
>> http://nhforge.org
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Simon Laroche
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
It's back now but it is super slow,
Simon
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Angel Java Lopez wrote:
> It's working for me (from Argentina)
> http://nhforge.org
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Simon Laroche wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> The web site seems to be down
>>
>> --
> You received thi
Angel puf!!! I can't remember any link where I have read something... my
SSD (my brain) has few free space.
Perhaps something in the MSDN or in the Scott's blog (Scott Hanselman)...
2010/3/2 Angel Java Lopez
> Source link?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Fabio Maulo wrote:
>
>> becau
It's working for me (from Argentina)
http://nhforge.org
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Simon Laroche wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The web site seems to be down
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhus
Hi guys,
The web site seems to be down
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For mor
@Fabio: you've completely lost me, but I'll take your word for it...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+unsubscr...@goo
Source link?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Fabio Maulo wrote:
> because MS said that you may have more than one thread in a request.
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhus...@googlegroups
A request can use more than one thread.
Diego
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 05:25, Zorgoban wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am implementing something like the UnitOfWork example from
>
> http://nhforge.org/wikis/patternsandpractices/nhibernate-and-the-unit-of-work-pattern.aspx
> .
> In this example, the Ses
because MS said that you may have more than one thread in a request.
2010/3/2 Zorgoban
> Hello!
>
> I am implementing something like the UnitOfWork example from
>
> http://nhforge.org/wikis/patternsandpractices/nhibernate-and-the-unit-of-work-pattern.aspx
> .
> In this example, the Session is st
you will see...
2010/3/2 Kent Boogaart
> @Fabio: what?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nhus...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> nhusers+unsubscr...@goog
35 matches
Mail list logo
