[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-29 Thread mscheibler
ng into the trunk? > > > Michael > > > On 29 Apr., 09:40, Roger Kratz wrote: > > > StatelessSession doesn't do cascade operations, AFAIK. > > > > -Original Message----- > > > From: nhusers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On > > Behalf Of

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-29 Thread Fabio Maulo
sers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On > Behalf Of mscheibler > > Sent: den 29 april 2009 07:57 > > To: nhusers > > Subject: [nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional > one-to-many > > > > Again: anyb

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-29 Thread Roger Kratz
: nhusers Subject: [nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many Hi Roger, that's what I experienced. The question now is if there is any other way to correctly insert the detail class including the foreign key. The reason I am asking is that A) from a DDD point of view

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-29 Thread mscheibler
gt; -Original Message- > From: nhusers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of > mscheibler > Sent: den 29 april 2009 07:57 > To: nhusers > Subject: [nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional > one-to-many > > Again: anybody? &

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-29 Thread Roger Kratz
StatelessSession doesn't do cascade operations, AFAIK. -Original Message- From: nhusers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mscheibler Sent: den 29 april 2009 07:57 To: nhusers Subject: [nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-28 Thread mscheibler
Again: anybody? On 28 Apr., 10:22, mscheibler wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > here are the mappings: > >       >         access='field'> >           >            UniqueId >              NextId >              50 >             >           >           access='field' /> >           >             >          

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-28 Thread mscheibler
Hi Fabio, here are the mappings: UniqueId NextId 50 Uniq

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-27 Thread Fabio Maulo
mappings? 2009/4/28 mscheibler > > Anybody? > > On 27 Apr., 09:06, mscheibler > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have two entities, A and B, with A having a collection of B but > > WITHOUT B having a reference to A. > > Of course the database foreign key column is in table B: > > > > class A { > >

[nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional one-to-many

2009-04-27 Thread mscheibler
Anybody? On 27 Apr., 09:06, mscheibler wrote: > Hello, > > I have two entities, A and B, with A having a collection of B but > WITHOUT B having a reference to A. > Of course the database foreign key column is in table B: > > class A { >   ICollection Bs { get; } > > } > > class B { >   ... // do